Q3G is a natural derivative of quercetin and is already widely used in various foods and drinks. Our results clearly demonstrated that Q3G exerts antiviral activity against ZIKV in both tissue culture and knockout mice, and that post-exposure in vivo treatment with Q3G could have a beneficial effect. In the future, Q3G should be tested in human cell lines (such as Huh-7, HeLa, or K048, a fetal brain neural stem cell line) to provide further data supporting its potential efficacy in humans; in addition, live viral loads or viremia should be tested in treated animals to supplement the survival results observed in this study. Although the treatment regimens will need to be further optimized (i.e., dosage, frequency of treatment, and administration routes), our results support the results of Q3G efficacy studies in nonhuman primates against ZIKV infection. Further studies will also be needed to investigate the mechanism of Q3G antiviral action, in order to obtain valuable insights into the design of novel targets for antiviral therapeutics in the future.
Citation: Gary Wong, Shihua He, Vinayakumar Siragam, Yuhai Bi, Majambu Mbikay, Michel Chretien, Xiangguo Qiu. Antiviral activity of quercetin-3-β-O-D-glucoside against Zika virus infection[J]. VIROLOGICA SINICA, 2017, 0 (0): 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-017-4057-9
Received: 4 August, 2017; Accepted: 23 August 2017; Published: 5 September 2017
Copyright: © Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Corresponding author: Phone: +1-204-784-7548, Fax: +1-204-789-2140, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org ORCID: 0000-0002-5578-9999.
# These authors contributed equally to this work.
The 2015–2016 outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) fever, first reported in Brazil during early 2015 (Zanluca et al., 2015), has infected millions of people and is a global public health concern. ZIKV infections are associated with fetal microcephaly, as well as neurological complications in humans. The virus can be shed in the semen and vaginal secretions of humans, leading to sexual transmission, and unexpectedly ZIKV infections cause severe damage to the male reproductive organs in male mice (Govero et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2016). Medical countermeasures to ZIKV are urgently needed. Vaccines and antivirals, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), are currently in pre-clinical development and not yet approved for human use. There have been concerns that vaccines and mAb-based products against ZIKV may inadvertently enhance the severity of Dengue virus (DENV) infections (Kawiecki and Christofferson, 2016; Richner et al., 2017), a potentially dangerous undesired side effect. Therefore, the development of small molecule drugs is a priority for controlling and preventing the spread of ZIKV.
Quercetin (3,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) is one of the most ubiquitous flavonoids, found in abundance in many Chinese herbs, vegetables, and fruits, as well as in red wine (Harwood et al., 2007). Quercetin has been shown to exert anti-proliferative, anti-oxidative, anti-bacterial, anti-cancer, and anti-viral effects; it was previously shown to have a beneficial effect on patients with severe complications from pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection (Uchide and Toyoda, 2011). Quercetin-3-β-O-D-glucoside (Q3G, molecular weight = 464.38) is a natural derivative of quercetin containing a glucoside molecule (Supplementary Figure S1A), which shows enhanced solubility and bioavailability when ingested (Hollman and Katan, 1997). Previous studies on quercetin and its derivatives focused on their functional properties with regard to potential therapeutic activity against cancer or inflammatory and anti-metabolic disease (D’Andrea, 2015). Recent studies have also demonstrated the antiviral activity of these compounds against a number of pathogens, including Influenza virus, Chikungunya virus, Epstein-Barr virus, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Mayaro virus, and Ebola virus (Cheng, et al., 2015; Qiu et al., 2016).
In this study, we investigated the anti-ZIKV effects of Q3G on Vero cells in vitro. In addition, the in vivo effects of Q3G were also evaluated in immunocompromised mice lacking the receptor for type I interferon (Jackson laboratories, 32045-JAX, Bar Harbour, ME), hereafter referred to as Ifnar1-/-. Q3G was obtained commercially (Sigma-Aldrich, 17793, Oakville, Canada). Two different ZIKV strains from the Asian lineage, which were isolated from laboratory-confirmed patients, were used for this study; PLCal_ZV (GenBank KF993678.1) was used for the in vitro experiments and PRVABC59 (GenBank KU501215) was used for the in vivo experiments. Stock viruses were grown in Vero cells (ATCC, CCL-81, Manassas, VA), and stored at –80 °C. All experiments were conducted in the Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) Laboratory at the National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Canada, and animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), with approval from the Animal Care Committee (ACC).
First, we evaluated the in vitro antiviral activity of Q3G. Our previous study had shown that treatment of Vero E6 cells with less than 100 μmol/L of Q3G does not result in cytotoxicity (Qiu et al., 2016). In the current study, Vero cells were pre-treated with 2-fold serially diluted Q3G (ranging from 0.67 μmol/L to 10.76 μmol/L) or DMSO (control) for 1 h at 37 °C, and infected with PLCal_ZV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.05. After 1 h, the inoculum was removed, and MEM supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% fetal bovine serum, and Q3G or DMSO was added. The viral RNA was extracted from the supernatant using the QIAamp viral RNA minikit (Qiagen, 52906, Toronto, Canada) at 2 or 4 days post-infection (dpi), and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) using the LightCycler 480 RNA Master Hydrolysis Probes kit (Roche, 04991885001, Mississauga, Canada) and a primer-probe set (Probe860), as reported previously (Lanciotti et al., 2008). The reaction conditions were as follows: 63 °C for 3 min; 95 °C for 30 s; and 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The reactions were performed on an ABI Step OnePlus thermocycler. The results for Q3G were normalized to the control (set at 0% inhibition). The 50% effective concentration (EC50) and 90% effective concentration (EC90) values were calculated using a four-parameter logistic regression in Prism 5 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). The EC50 and EC90 of Q3G against PLCal_ZV were approximately 1.2–1.3 μmol/L and 1.5 μmol/L, respectively, when assessed at both 2 and 4 dpi (Figure 1A). The Q3G-mediated inhibition of PLCal_ZV (MOI = 0.05) in Vero cells was also confirmed visually under a microscope, and complete inhibition of cytopathic effects (CPE) was observed at a concentration of 6.9 μmol/L at 4 dpi (Figure S1B).
We then used the same in vitro infection conditions to quantify the expression of ZIKV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) at 4 dpi, in order to estimate virus replication at the protein level. NS1 is known to be a major host-interaction molecule involved in virus replication, pathogenesis, and immune evasion (Rastogi et al., 2016). Using an anti-ZIKV NS1 ELISA kit (BioFront Technologies, ZIKV-NS-1-EK, Tallahassee, FL), we showed that Q3G could inhibit the replication of PLCal_ZV in a dose-dependent manner, as evidenced by the decrease in NS1 in both the cell supernatant and lysate, with statistically significant (as determined by Student’s t-test) reductions observed at concentrations above 0.6 μmol/L (Figure 1B, 1C).
Next, we tested the protective efficacy of Q3G in immunocompromised mice (Ifnar1-/-) that were previously shown to be susceptible to ZIKV infection (Lazear et al., 2016). Our previous study had shown that the administration of Q3G at doses of 100 mg/kg or lower to mice do not result in substantial weight loss or death (Qiu et al., 2016). In the current study, 1 × 106 plaque forming units (PFU)/animal of the PRVABC59 isolate of ZIKV was intraperitoneally injected into 6- to 8-week old male or female Ifnar1-/- mice (n = 6 per group) (day 0) ; the mice were then observed daily for survival and weight loss. We administered Q3G via IP at a dose of 50 mg/kg beginning at 1 day after challenge (day 1) and continuing for 7 days (day 8). Control animals were administered the same volume of PBS under the same regimens (Figure 1D). The control animals uniformly succumbed to ZIKV infection at 7 dpi with an average of ~20% weight loss at the time of death (Figure 1E, 1F). Post-exposure administration of Q3G was partially effective, with 50% of the animals surviving the infection and an average weight loss of ~20% (Figure 1E, 1F). Administration of Q3G via IP at a dose of 50 mg/kg beginning at 1 day before challenge (day -1) and continuing for 7 days (day 5) yielded neither survivors nor a substantial delay in the time to death (data not shown).
During the 2014–2016 outbreak of Ebola virus disease, clinically licensed or near-approved drugs for other diseases were repurposed to treat Ebola out of desperation, despite the lack of efficacy data in some cases (Wong and Kobinger, 2015), as the compounds were already shown to be safe for human use. The proactive generation of pre-clinical efficacy data on licensed or near-approved drugs against other pathogens in cell cultures and animal models is therefore important, as it provides medical professionals a scientific basis to make informed decisions for treatment options in case of emergencies. Q3G is a natural derivative of quercetin and is already widely used in various foods and drinks. Our results clearly demonstrated that Q3G exerts antiviral activity against ZIKV in both tissue culture and knockout mice, and that post-exposure in vivo treatment with Q3G could have a beneficial effect. In the future, Q3G should be tested in human cell lines (such as Huh-7, HeLa, or K048, a fetal brain neural stem cell line) to provide further data supporting its potential efficacy in humans; in addition, live viral loads or viremia should be tested in treated animals to supplement the survival results observed in this study. Although the treatment regimens will need to be further optimized (i.e., dosage, frequency of treatment, and administration routes), our results support the results of Q3G efficacy studies in nonhuman primates against ZIKV infection. Further studies will also be needed to investigate the mechanism of Q3G antiviral action, in order to obtain valuable insights into the design of novel targets for antiviral therapeutics in the future.
This work was supported by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) as well as grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR, LDI-003893-CIHR-IER-143487) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH, 1U19AI109762-01) to XQ. GW is the recipient of a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship from CIHR and the President’s International Fellowship Initiative from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). All experiments were conducted in the Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) Laboratory at the National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Canada, and animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), with approval from the Animal Care Committee (ACC). All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed. The authors declare no competing interests.
- 1. Cheng Z, Sun G, Guo W, et al. 2015. Virol Sin, 30: 261-268.
- 2. D’Andrea G. 2015. . Fitoterapia, 106: 256-271.
- 3. Govero J, Esakky P, Scheaffer SM, et al. 2016. Nature, 540: 438-442.
- 4. Harwood M, Danielewska-Nikiel B, Borzelleca JF, et al. 2007. . Food Chem Toxicol, 45: 2179-2205.
- 5. Hollman PC, Katan MB. 1997. . Biomed Pharmacother, 51: 305-310.
- 6. Kawiecki AB, Christofferson RC. 2016. J Infect Dis, 214: 1357-1360.
- 7. Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, et al. 2008. Emerg Infect Dis, 14: 1232-1239.
- 8. Lazear HM, Govero J, Smith AM, et al. 2016. Cell Host Microbe, 19: 720-730.
- 9. Ma W, Li S, Ma S, et al. 2016. Cell, 167: 1511-1524.
- 10. Qiu X, Kroeker A, He S, et al. 2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 60: 5182-5188.
- 11. Rastogi M, Sharma N, Singh SK. 2016. Virol J, 13: 131.
- 12. Richner JM, Himansu S, Dowd KA, et al. 2017. Cell, 168: 1114-1125.
- 13. Uchide N, Toyoda H. 2011. Molecules, 16: 2032-2052.
- 14. Wong G, Kobinger GP. 2015. Clin Microbiol Rev, 28: 593-601.
- 15. Zanluca C, Melo VC, Mosimann AL, et al. 2015. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 110: 569-572.