For best viewing of the website please use Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome.
Citation: Trevor Williams, Nilesh S.Chitnis, Shän L. Bilimoria. Invertebrate Iridovirus Modulation of Apoptosis [J].VIROLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 24(4) : 295-304.

Invertebrate Iridovirus Modulation of Apoptosis

  • Apoptosis; Invertebrate iridescent virus 6; Induction by endocytosis; Inhibition of apoptosis (iap) gene; Iridoviridae; JNK pathway involvement.

  • 加载中
    1. Balange-Orange N, Devauchelle G. 1982. Lipid com-position of an iridescent virus type 6 (CIV). Arch Virol, 73: 363-367.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01318091

    2. Bilimoria S L. 2001. Use of viral proteins for controlling the cotton boll weevil and other insect pests. United States Patent, No. 6200561 B1.

    3. Birnbaum M J, Clem R J, Miller L K. 1994. An apoptosis-inhibiting gene from a nuclear polyhedrosis virus encoding a polypeptide with Cys/His sequence motifs. J Virol, 68: 2521-2528.

    4. Brennecke J, Hipfner D R, Stark A, et al. 2003. bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the pro-apoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell, 113: 25-36.
        doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00231-9

    5. Chen C H, Guo M, Hay B A. 2006. Identifying microRNA regulators of cell death in Drosophila. In: Methods in Molecular Biology: MicroRNA Protocols (Ying S Y ed.), Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. p. 229-240.

    6. Chinchar V G, Bryan L, Wang J, et al. 2003. Induction of apoptosis in frog virus 3-infected cells. Virology, 306: 303-312.
        doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(02)00039-9

    7. Chinchar V G, Dholakia J N. 1989. Frog virus 3-induced translational shut-off: activation of an eIF2 kinase in virus-infected cells. Virus Res, 14: 207-224.
        doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(89)90002-6

    8. Chinchar V G, Essbauer S, He J G, et al. 2005. Iridoviridae. In Virus Taxonomy: Ⅷ Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (C. M. Fauquet, M. A. Mayo, J. Maniloff, et al. Eds.), London: Elsevier. p. 145-162.

    9. Chinchar V G, Hyatt A, Miyazaki T, et al. 2009. Iridoviridae: poor viral relations no longer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 328: 123-170.

    10. Chitnis N S, D'Costa S M, Paul E R, et al. 2008. Modulation of iridovirus-induced apoptosis by endocytosis, early expression, JNK, and apical caspase. Virology, 370: 333-342.
        doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.09.010

    11. Cullen B R. 2006. Viruses and microRNAs. Nat Genet, 38 Suppl: 25-30.

    12. Constantino M, Christian P, Marina C F, et al. 2001. A comparison of techniques for detecting Invertebrate irides-cent virus 6. J Virol Meth, 98: 109-118.
        doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00356-1

    13. Crook N E, Clem R J, Miller L K. 1993. An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J Virol, 67: 2168-2174.

    14. Delhon G, Tulman E R, Afonso C L, et al. 2006. Genome of invertebrate iridescent virus type 3 (mosquito iridescent virus). J Virol, 80: 8439-8449.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.00464-06

    15. Devauchelle G, Attias J, Monnier C, et al. 1985. Chilo iridescent virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 116, 37-48.

    16. Eaton H E, Metcalf J, Penny E, et al. 2007. Comparative genomic analysis of the family Iridoviridae: re-annotating and defining the core set of iridovirus genes. Virol J, 4: 11 doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-4-11

    17. Essbauer S, Ahne W. 2002. The epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus (Iridoviridae) induces apoptosis in vitro. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health, 49: 25-30.
        doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00531.x

    18. Federici B A. 1984. Diseases of terrestrial isopods. Symp Zool Soc Lond, 53: 233-245.

    19. Fowler H G. 1989. An epizootic iridovirus of Orthoptera (Gryllotalpidae: Scapteriscus borellii) and its pathogenicity to termites (Isoptera: Cryptotermes). Rev Microbiol, 20: 115-120.

    20. Fukaya M, Nasu S. 1966. A Chilo iridescent virus from the rice stem borer, Chilo supressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyrallidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 1: 69-72.

    21. Fukuda T. 1971. Per os transmission of Chilo iridescent virus to mosquitoes. J Invertebr Pathol, 18: 152-153.
        doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(91)90027-N

    22. Funk C J, Hunter W B, Achor D S. 2001. Replication of insect iridescent virus 6 in a whitefly cell line. J Invertebr Pathol, 77: 144-146.
        doi: 10.1006/jipa.2000.5006

    23. Galluzzi L, Brenner C, Morselli E, et al. 2008. Viral control of mitochondrial apoptosis. PLoS Pathog, 4: e1000018.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000018

    24. Grosholz E D. 1992. Interactions of intraspecific, inters-pecific and apparent competition with host-pathogen population dynamics. Ecology, 73: 507-514.
        doi: 10.2307/1940756

    25. Hay B A, Guo M. 2006. Caspase-dependent cell death in Drosophila. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 22: 623-650.
        doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012804.093845

    26. Henderson C W, Johnson C L, Lodhi S A, et al. 2001. Replication of Chilo iridescent virus in the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis, and development of an in-fectivity assay. Arch Virol, 146: 767-775.
        doi: 10.1007/s007050170145

    27. Holley C L, Olson R R, Colón-Ramos D A, et al. 2002. Reaper-mediated elimination of IAP proteins through stimulated IAP degradation and generalized translational inhibition. Nat Cell Biol, 4: 439-444.
        doi: 10.1038/ncb798

    28. Hu G B, Cong R S, Fan T J, et al. 2004. Induction of apoptosis in a flounder gill cell line by lymphocystis disease virus infection. J Fish Dis, 27: 657-662.
        doi: 10.1111/jfd.2004.27.issue-11

    29. Huang X, Huang Y, Gong J, et al. 2008. Identification and characterization of a putative lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor (LITAF) homolog from Singapore grouper iridovirus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 373: 140-145.
        doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.003

    30. Huang Y H, Huang X H, Gui J F, et al. 2007. Mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis induced by Rana grylio virus infection in fish cells. Apoptosis, 12: 1569-1577.
        doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0089-1

    31. Hunter W B, Lapointe S L. 2003. Iridovirus infection of cell cultures from the Diaprepes root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus. J Insect Sci, 3: 37.

    32. Imajoh M, Sugiura H, Oshima S. 2004. Morphological changes contribute to apoptotic cell death and are affected by caspase-3 and caspase-6 inhibitors during red sea bream iridovirus permissive replication. Virology, 322: 220-230.
        doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.02.006

    33. Ince I A, Westenberg M, Vlak J M, et al. 2008. Open reading frame 193R of Chilo iridescent virus encodes a functional inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP). Virology, 376: 124-131.
        doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.03.009

    34. Jakob N J, Müller K, Bahr U, et al. 2001. Analysis of the first complete DNA sequence of an invertebrate iridovirus: coding strategy of the genome of Chilo iridescent virus. Virology, 286: 182-196.
        doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.0963

    35. Jensen D D, Hukuhara T, Tanada Y. 1972. Lethality of Chilo iridescent virus to Colladonus montana leafhoppers. J Invertebr Pathol, 19: 276-278.
        doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(72)90220-0

    36. Just F T, Essbauer S S. 2001. Characterization of an iridescent virus isolated from Gryllus bimaculatus (Or-thoptera: Gryllidae). J Invertebr Pathol, 77: 51-61.
        doi: 10.1006/jipa.2000.4985

    37. Kelly D C, Robertson J S. 1973. Icosahedral cytoplasmic deoxyriboviruses. J Gen Virol, 20: 17-41 (suppl).

    38. Kleespies R G, Tidona C A, Darai G. 1999. Characteri-zation of a new iridovirus isolated from crickets and investi-gations on the host range. J Invertebr Pathol, 73: 84-90.
        doi: 10.1006/jipa.1998.4821

    39. Lai Y S, Chiou P P, Chen W J, et al. 2008. Characteri-zation of apoptosis induced by grouper iridovirus in two newly established cell lines from barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch). J Fish Dis, 31: 825-834.
        doi: 10.1111/jfd.2008.31.issue-11

    40. Lannan E, Vandergaast R, Friesen P D. 2007. Ba-culovirus caspase inhibitors P49 and P35 block virus-induced apoptosis downstream of effector caspase DrICE activation in Drosophila melanogaster cells. J Virol, 81: 9319-9330.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.00247-07

    41. Lin P W, Huang Y J, John J A, et al. 2008. Iridovirus Bcl-2 protein inhibits apoptosis in the early stage of viral infection. Apoptosis, 13: 165-176.
        doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0152-y

    42. Lockshin R A, Zakeri Z, Tilly J L. 1998. When Cells Die: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Apoptosis and Programmed Cell Death, New York: Wiley-Liss, p528.

    43. López M, Rojas J C, Vandame R, et al. 2002. Parasitoid-mediated transmission of an iridescent virus. J Invertebr Pathol, 80: 160-170.
        doi: 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00106-4

    44. Marina C F, Arredondo-Jiménez J I, Castillo A, et al. 1999. Sublethal effects of iridovirus disease in a mosquito. Oecologia, 119: 383-388.
        doi: 10.1007/s004420050799

    45. Marina C F, Ibarra J E, Arredondo-Jiménez J I, et al. 2003. Adverse effects of covert iridovirus infection on life history and demographic parameters of Aedes aegypti. Entomol Exp Appl, 106: 53-61.
        doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00010.x

    46. McIntosh A H, Kimura M. 1974. Replication of the Chilo iridescent virus (CIV) in a poikilothermic vertebrate cell line. Intervirol, 4: 257-267.
        doi: 10.1159/000149858

    47. McLaughlin R E, Scott H A, Bell M R. 1972. Infection of the boll weevil by Chilo iridescent virus. J Invertebr Pathol, 19: 285-290.
        doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(72)90224-8

    48. Miller L K. 1997. Baculovirus interaction with host apoptotic pathways. J Cell Physiol, 173: 178-182.
        doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4652

    49. Mitsuhashi J. 1967. Infection of the green rice hopper, Nephotetix cincticeps by Chilo iridescent virus. J In-vertebr Pathol, 9: 432-436.
        doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(67)90084-5

    50. Mullens B A, Velten R K, Federici B A. 1999. Iridescent virus infection in Culicoides variipennis sonorensis and interactions with the mermithid parasite Heleidomermis magnapapula. J Invertebr Pathol, 73: 231-233.
        doi: 10.1006/jipa.1998.4838

    51. Nalcacioglu R, InceI A, Demirbag Z. 2009. The biology of Chilo iridescent virus (Iridoviridae). Virol Sinica, 24 (4): 285-294.
        doi: 10.1007/s12250-009-3051-2

    52. Oberst A, Bender C, Green D R. 2008. Living with death: the evolution of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in animals. Cell Death Differ, 15: 1149-1136.

    53. Ohba M. 1975. Studies on the parthogenesis of Chilo iridescent virus 3. Multiplication of CIV in the silkworm Bombyx mori L. and field insects. Sci Bull Fac Agr Kyushu Univ, 30: 71-81. (in Japanese)

    54. Ohba M, Aizawa K. 1979. Multiplication of Chilo iridescent virus in noninsect arthropods. J Invertebr Pathol, 33: 278-283.
        doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(79)90027-2

    55. Paul E R, Chitnis N S, Henderson C W, et al. 2007. Induction of apoptosis by iridovirus virion protein extract. Arch Virol, 152: 1353-1364.
        doi: 10.1007/s00705-007-0945-x

    56. Pomar N, Berlanga J J, Campuzano S, et al. 2003. Functional characterization of Drosophila melanogaster PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) kinase. FEBS J, 270: 293-306.

    57. Seshagiri S, Miller L K. 1997. Baculovirus inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) black activation of Sf-caspase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94: 13606-13611.
        doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13606

    58. Shiozaki E N, Chai J, Rigotti D J, et al. 2003. Me-chanism of XIAP-mediated inhibition of caspase-9. Mol Cell, 11: 519-527.
        doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00054-6

    59. Song W, Lin Q, Joshi S B, et al. 2006. Proteomic studies of the Singapore grouper iridovirus. Mol Cell Prot, 5.2: 256-264.

    60. Stark A, Brennecke J, Russell R B, et al. 2003 Identification of Drosophila MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol, 1: e60, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000060

    61. Tidona C A, Darai G 1997. The complete DNA sequence of lymphocystis disease virus. Virology, 230: 207-216.
        doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8456

    62. Tonka T, Weiser J. 2000. Iridovirus infection in mayfly larvae. J Invertebr Pathol, 76: 229-231.
        doi: 10.1006/jipa.2000.4971

    63. Vaux D L, Silke J. 2005. IAPs, RINGs and ubiquitylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 6: 287-297.
        doi: 10.1038/nrm1621

    64. Williams T. 1993. Covert iridovirus infection of blackfly larvae. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 251: 225-230.
        doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0033

    65. Williams T. 2008 Natural invertebrate hosts to iridoviruses (Iridoviridae). Neotrop Entomol, 37: 615-632.
        doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000600001

    66. Williams T, Barbosa-Solomieu V, Chinchar V G. 2005. A decade of advances in iridovirus research. Adv Virus Res, 65: 173-248.
        doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(05)65006-3

    67. Williams T, Hernández O. 2006. Costs of cannibalism in the presence of an iridovirus pathogen of Spodoptera frugiperda. Ecol Entomol, 31: 106-113.
        doi: 10.1111/een.2006.31.issue-2

    68. Yu J Y, Silke J, Ekert P G. 2006. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins and caspases. In: Apoptosis, Cell Signaling, and Human Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms (Srivastava R. ed.), Volume 2. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. p. 313-334.

  • 加载中


Article Metrics

Article views(1941) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()

Proportional views
    通讯作者: 陈斌,
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Invertebrate Iridovirus Modulation of Apoptosis

      Corresponding author: Trevor Williams,
    • 1. Instituto de Ecología AC, Xalapa, Ver 91070, Mexico
    • 2. Abramson Cancer Center and Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • 3. Department of Biological Sciences, The Center for Biotechnology and Genomics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA

    Abstract: Apoptosis; Invertebrate iridescent virus 6; Induction by endocytosis; Inhibition of apoptosis (iap) gene; Iridoviridae; JNK pathway involvement.

    • The family Iridoviridae comprises large icosahedral viruses with an internal lipid membrane and a large dsDNA genome (~100-210 kb) that is circularly permuted and terminally redundant (8). The family currently comprises five genera, of which two, Iridovirus and Chloriridovirus, encompass viruses that have been isolated solely from invertebrates and are collectively known as invertebrate iridescent viruses (IIVs).

      IIVs infect > 100 species of invertebrates, the majority of which are insects and terrestrial isopods, that usually occupy damp or aquatic habitats during at least one stage of the host life cycle (65). The range of insect species naturally infected by IIVs includes medically-important species of mosquitoes, midges and blackflies and agricultural pests, including several lepidopteran species of great economic significance. IIVs particles assemble in the cytoplasm and are arranged in paracrystaline arrays that result in infected hosts taking on a distinct iridescent appearance. The iridescent hues are the characteristic sign of patent disease that is invariably lethal to the host and from which this family of viruses gets its name.

      To date, IIVs have attracted little interest due to the often low prevalence of patent disease in host populations. However, unapparent infections, that do not kill the host, may be orders of magnitude more common than patent infections by these viruses (44, 62, 64). Moreover, sublethally infected insects can show marked reductions in their reproductive capacity, adult longevity and body size, at least in the case of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (45). The question of how IIVs transmit between hosts remains largely unanswered, although predation or cannibalism of patently infected individuals involving the consumption of massive quantities of virus particles was demonstrated as a viable route of transmission in terrestrial isopods, crickets and one species of Lepidoptera (18, 19, 24, 67). Alternative routes exploit the high infectivity of IIVs by injection, for example, nematode or parasitoid-mediated transmission can be highly efficient and involve the introduction of small numbers of particles into host tissues during host penetration or wasp oviposition, respectively (43, 50).

      The type species of the Iridovirus genus is Inver-tebrate iridescent virus 6 (IIV-6), also known as Chilo iridescent virus, which was originally isolated from the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Japan (20). IIV-6 is one of only two IIVs to have been completely sequenced to date (14, 34). The genome is 212, 482 bp, with a G+C content of 29%, and encodes 193 non-overlapping ORFs, or 234 ORFs if overlapping ORFs are included (34). Strains of this virus have been identified infecting commercial colonies of crickets in northern Europe (36, 38), and the fall armyworm in Mexico (67). The range of species that can be infected with this virus by injection is extensive and includes numerous species of medical and agricultural importance (21, 26, 35, 49, 53), in addition to a number of non-insect arthropods (54). Similarly, IIV-6 is capable of replicating in a wide range of cell lines from insects (1, 12, 15, 22, 31), and even a reptile (46) at temperatures of < 30℃, whereas mammalian cell lines are not permissive (37).

      The ability to effectively manipulate host cell defenses is necessary for virus survival and provides immediate rewards in generating opportunities for the transmission of progeny virus particles. The best characterized and most important of host cell res-ponses to viral infection is apoptosis, a programmed sequence of events leading to cell death. We review recent advances that have provided new insights into the mechanisms by which IIVs elicit and inhibit host apoptotic responses. We also highlight novel avenues of research that offer possible biotechnological appli-cations for the components of the IIV system for apoptosis control.

    • Apoptosis is an energetically-active, orchestrated sequence of biochemical processes, characterized by a series of distinct morphological changes that lead to cell death. This process is of key importance in deve-lopment, cell number homeostasis, the eradication of damaged or defective cells and in the control of in-fection (42). The main steps in apoptosis involve (ⅰ) chromatin condensation and endonuclease-mediated degradation of nuclear DNA, (ⅱ) disruption of the cytoskeleton leading to cytoplasmic shrinkage and detachment from neighboring cells, (ⅲ) nuclear fragmentation and cell blebbing that results in the appearance of apoptotic bodies, and finally (ⅳ) pha-gocytosis of apoptotic bodies that exhibit phosp-hatidlyserine on the outer membrane, and subsequent degradation by the lysosomes of phagocytic cells. Importantly, cell contents are repackaged during apop-totic fragmentation without leakage of the cells' cons-tituent components.

      There are two major pathways by which cells can be triggered to undergo apoptosis. The extrinsic pathway, which relies on signals from outside of the cell, involves activation of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or Fas-ligand receptors that bind to death domain associated proteins (TRADD/FADD) that together form the Death-inducing signal complex (DISC) that directly activates caspase-8, an apical or initiator caspase. Caspases are cysteine proteases that function as homodimers and which are activated by cleavage. Caspase-8 activates effector caspases (cas-pase-3, -6, -7) that are responsible for triggering the cascade of apoptotic events. Apoptosis in insects is best understood in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) (25). In Drosophila, one me-chanism includes the interaction of Eiger (invertebrate TNF ligand) with the wengen membrane receptor. This leads to activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which then triggers the central initiator caspase Dronc, instigating a cascade that sets off the effector caspase Drice and ultimately cell apoptosis. As such, the Eiger-wengen mediated pathway appears to be the invertebrate equivalent of the extrinsic pathway found in mammalian systems (25).

      In contrast, the intrinsic pathway relies on signals from the mitochondria in response to cellular stress, toxins or UV damage. Permeabilization of the mito-chondrial membrane results in loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, a halt to mitochondrial bi-oenergetic functions, and the release of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins into the cytosol. These proteins include caspase activators like cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo, as well as caspase-independent death effectors including an apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease G. Cytochrome c binds to Apaf-1 (Apoptotic protease activating factor 1) and these complexes undergo a dramatic assembly process to form a disk-shaped heptamer, known as the apopto-some, which serves as an activation machine for ini-tiator caspase-9 and effector caspases, such as cap-sase-3. However, in insects the role of mitochondrial pathways during apoptosis induction remains unclear (52). Induction of apoptosis in uninfected Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) cells appears to involve the equivalents of mammalian apical caspase and caspase-3 as initiator and effector caspases, respectively (25), whereas in Drosophila, the Dronc caspase may be activated through endoplasmic reti-culum stress or through Bcl-2-type stimulation (dis-cussed below), and these could represent invertebrate equivalents of the intrinsic pathways described from mammals.

      As would be expected, a number of cellular anti-apoptotic factors regulate the pro-apoptotic factors and the decision to initiate apoptosis is determined by the balance between the cells own promoting and inhibiting entities. For the extrinsic pathway the cellular TNF Receptor Associated Factors (TRAFs) activate MAP kinase that in turn activates IκB kinase (IKK) which liberates NF-κB from its inhibitory complex leading to NF-κB-mediated upregulation of antiapoptotic genes, such as TRAFs that prevent DISC complex formation, or FLICE-like inhibitory protein (cFLIP) that inhibits caspase-8 activation.

      For the intrinsic pathway the principal inhibitory agent is Bcl-2, which is located on the external mitochondrial membrane and which blocks apoptosis by binding to Apaf-1 thus preventing activation of capsase-9. Bcl-2 also stabilizes the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane (23). The antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and the closely related Bcl-xL each possess four BH domains whereas related members of the Bcl-2 family, notably Bid, Bax, Bak and Bad, the so-called BH3 only proteins, only possess BH domain 3 and are proapoptotic in nature. Bid interacts with Bax and/or Bak to form an oligomeric pore in the outer mito-chondrial membrane whereas Bad forms a heterodimer with Bcl-2/Bcl-xL thereby eliminating the inhibitory effect on Apaf-1 and allowing Bax/Bak-triggered apoptosis.

      The final group of antiapoptotic entities is comprised of the cellular Inhibitors of apoptosis (cIAP) which have the potential to inhibit apoptosis activated by either the intrinsic or the extrinsic pathways. This is because they can bind to both activator and effector caspases and appear to be present ubiquitously in metazoan organisms. IAPs were first identified in a baculovirus (13) and are characterized by one, but usually two or three, baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains, consisting of approximately 70 amino acids, and a zinc-binding C-terminal RING finger domain (48). cIAPs are themselves negatively regulated by the mitochondrial proteins Smac/Diablo and Omi/HtrA2, the latter being a serine protease that binds to, and cleaves, cIAP. The mode of action of IAPs has been best characterized for the mammalian X-linked IAP (XIAP) which acts by binding at BIR domain 3 (BIR3) to caspase-9 at a site that prevents caspase dimerization, forcing the caspase active site to adopt an inactive conformation (58). The interaction of XIAP with effector caspases is quite different and involves pairs of dimerized caspases. For caspases-3 or -7 the linker region preceding the BIR2 domain blocks the catalytic site of one caspase dimer whereas the IAP binding motif from the opposing dimer binds to a groove on BIR2 (68). In contrast, in insect cells, it appears that baculovirus IAPs may function by blocking the activation of procaspases, such as procaspase-1 (57). Finally, IAPs may have an additional means of exerting their effects by functioning as E3 ubiquitin ligases. In Drosophila, the RING domain of a cIAP (DIAP1) can recruit a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (UBC) to an initiator capsase (Dronc) or other pro-apoptotic proteins which, once ubiquitinated, are flagged for proteasome-mediated degradation or modi-fication (63). The mode of action of baculovirus IAPs is notably different from that of other baculovirus antiapoptotic proteins such as P35 or P49 that block virus-induced apoptosis downstream of the effector caspase Drice in Drosophila cells (40).

      We cannot finish this section without mentioning the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in post-trans-criptional regulation of gene expression, a topic that is currently attracting enormous interest. The role of miRNAs in regulating apoptosis is still far from clear although the miR-2 family of miRNAs has been identified as regulators of reaper, grim and sickle proapoptotic genes in Drosophila cells (60), whereas the proapoptotic hid gene is targeted by the microRNA bantam (4). Indeed, it seems that miRNA modulated processes are likely to prove highly influential in regulating pathogen induced apoptosis in Drosophila (5) and across a wide range of other taxa (11).

    • The mechanisms by which iridoviruses gain entry to the cell, replicate and transmit themselves has been described elsewhere in this special issue of Virologica Sinica (51) and in recent reviews by others (9, 66). Recently, Bilimoria and colleagues showed that a virion protein extract (VPE) prepared from IIV-6 particles induced apoptosis in spruce budworm (IPRI-CF124T) and boll weevil (BRL-AG-3A) cell lines as detected by blebbing, DNA fragmentation, and TUNEL assay (55). Tissue culture assays revealed that spruce budworm cells were eight times more sensitive to VPE than boll weevil cells. A pancaspase inhibitor suppressed apoptosis but its effect on the inhibition of host protein synthesis was marginal. Furthermore, the effective VPE dose for induction of apoptosis was 1000-fold lower than that required for shutdown of host protein synthesis. Protein kinase activity was also detected in VPE. Heating VPE at 60℃ for 30 min destroyed all three activities, sug-gesting that one or more polypeptides in the IIV-6 particle are responsible for inducing apoptosis.

      To determine whether exterior or interior stimuli were required for IIV-6 induced apoptosis a series of experiments was performed using polystyrene-bound virus particles and chemical endocytosis inhibitors. The interaction of IIV-6 particles with the cell surface failed to induce apoptosis in studies in which cells were treated with UV-inactivated virus that was first bound to polystyrene beads. Moreover endocytosis in-hibitors (bafilomycin or ammonium chloride) blocked the induction of apoptosis by intact or UV-inactivated virus, or VPE, indicating that entry of one or more virion components via endocytosis is required for induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, the strong apoptotic response to VPE compared to the weak response observed fol-lowing treatment with infectious IIV-6 particles led these authors to postulate that viral gene expression may have been involved in inhibiting host apoptosis (10).

    • Chitnis et al. (10) were the first to demonstrate JNK signal requirement during apoptosis induction by an insect virus. High concentrations of intact IIV-6 particles (400 μg/mL), UV-irradiated virus (10 μg/mL) and VPE (10 μg/mL) induced apoptosis in 60% of treated lepidopteran cells (Choristoneura fumiferana; IPRI-CF-124T), whereas a moderate concentration of infectious IIV-6 (10 μg/mL) induced apoptosis in only 10% of cells. Apoptosis was inhibited by the apical caspase inhibitor, Z-IETD-FMK, indicating that caspase activity is required for virus-induced apoptosis. Further studies revealed that treatment with UV-irradiated virus or VPE enhanced virus-induced caspase activity by 80%, relative to mock-treated cells, at 24 h after treatment. As the MAP kinase pathway may induce or inhibit apoptosis depending on cellular context a JNK inhibitor (SP600125) was used to demonstrate drastic suppression of VPE-induced apoptosis. It appears, therefore, that the JNK signaling pathway is signify-cantly involved in apoptosis in IIV-6 infections of C. fumiferana cells.

      The weak apoptotic response to moderate concen-trations of infectious virus particles led these workers to postulate that viral gene expression may be in-volved in inhibiting apoptosis (10). Infection of cells in which protein synthesis was inhibited with cy-cloheximide resulted in 69% of the cell population undergoing apoptosis compared to 10% in normal infection indicating that de novo synthesis of viral proteins was not required for viral induction of apoptosis. Furthermore, blocking viral DNA repli-cation with aphidicolin or phosphonoacetic acid sup-pressed apoptosis and virus-induced caspase activity, suggesting that early expression of viral genes was necessary for inhibition of apoptosis. These results were quickly confirmed by Ince et al (33) in studies on a candidate inhibitor of apoptosis gene in IIV-6.

      The genome of IIV-6 codes for an iap gene (193R), first identified by Birnbaum et al. (3) as having one BIR domain and a C3HC4 RING finger motif at the C-terminal end of the ORF. The ORF 193R is 624 bp (208 aa) in length with a predicted mass of 22.8 kDa, and shares 15% identity and 28% similarity in its amino acid sequence to IAP-3 from Cydia pomonella ganulovirus (CpGV), the first IAP protein identified in baculoviruses (13). Recently, this ORF was con-clusively demonstrated to be a functional iap gene (33). Transcription studies revealed that IIV-6 iap transcripts were detectable from 4 h post-infection and that transcription did not require prior DNA or protein synthesis, indicating that IIV-6 iap is an immediate early class gene. Transient expression of IIV-6 iap under the control of the AcMNPV ie1 promoter prevented cellular DNA fragmentation and was as effective as transiently expressed AcMNPV p35 in reducing actinomycin-D induced apoptosis of two insect cell lines. Finally, permissive Bombyx mori cells (SPC-BM-36) inoculated with a high concentration of IIV-6 particles developed apoptotic like vesicles at 24 h post-infection, but these structures disappeared later in infection and no evidence of genomic DNA frag-mentation was observed in virus-treated cells. In contrast, cells in which the iap gene was knocked down by dsRNA transfection underwent prolific apoptotic body formation and DNA fragmentation at 24-48 h post-infection (33).

    • Induction of apoptosis has been reported in a number of fish and amphibian iridoviruses (28, 30, 32, 39). Notably, untreated, heat-inactivated or UV-inacti-vated Frog virus 3 (FV-3, genus Ranavirus) all triggered apoptosis of fish and mammalian cells, indicating that intact viral DNA or viral polypeptides were not required to initiate apoptosis (6). Not surpri-singly, Epizootic hematopoietic necrosis virus (EHNV) induced apoptosis of fish epithelioma cells was markedly reduced in the presence of a nonspecific protein kinase inhibitor (17). A number of putative antiapoptotic genes have been identified in the vertebrate iridoviruses including a Bcl-2 protein, ubiquitin ligases with RING finger domains, and a SAP domain containing peptide (59) as well as TNF-α, TNF receptor, Cathepsin-B and CARD-like caspase orthologs which may have potent proapoptotic properties (16, 29, 59, 61). However, to date, only the Grouper iridovirus (GIV) Bcl-2 homolog has been demonstrated to be a functional antiapoptotic gene (41). The GIV-Bcl protein is also present in the virion.

    • All this leads us to present a working model for the biological significance of apoptotic and host shutoff effects of IIV-6 (Fig. 1). The active polypeptide(s) present in infecting virus particles inhibit host protein synthesis regardless of viral gene expression. This allows the virus to take control of the cellular syn-thetic machinery. The host responds by initiating apop-tosis and the virus in turn, expresses an immediate early gene (iap 193R) whose product inhibits apop-tosis (33). This block on apoptosis is so effective that sufficient time is available for massive numbers of virus particles to be assembled in each cell prior to lysis and virus dissemination.

      Figure 1.  Working model for induction and inhibition of apoptosis by IIV-6 in insect cells based on a Drosophila cellular system. The proposed pathway is shown in black, other cellular pathways are shown in grey. Virus particles or components of the virion protein extract (VPE) enter the cell via endocytosis. Kinase activity in particles/VPE phosphorylates JNK or another member of the MAP kinase pathway upstream of JNK. JNK then activates RHG proteins, such as Reaper, that dissociates the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis DIAP1 from Dronc leading to degradation of DIAP1. Reaper also inhibits host protein synthesis, which may in turn enhance apoptosis by reducing cellular levels of DIAP1 (dashed line) (27). Activated Dronc and/or a virus-induced apical caspase then activates the effector caspase Drice which then carries out destruction of the cell. Early expression of the IIV-6 iap gene (ORF 193R) inhibits Dronc/virus-induced caspase thus avoiding activation of Drice.

      According to the Drosophila-based model (Fig. 1), the virion component (s) of IIV-6 activates JNK, which results in reaper-induced apoptosis via the Dronc initiator caspase. Reaper inhibits protein synthesis. Consequently, Chitnis et al. (10) have postulated that JNK is upstream of reaper and the Dronc-like virus-induced caspase in C. fumiferana cells. If this model is valid, then a JNK inhibitor should block translational inhibition. However, if the model does not hold, then phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF2α must also be investigated. In Drosophila, an endoplasmic reticulum-resident kinase (Dperk) phosphorylates eIF2α in response to stress (56). Infection by the vertebrate iridovirus FV-3 results in phosphorylation of host eIF2α and translational shut-off (7). If a com-ponent of the IIV-6 virion is capable of phosphory-lating eIF2α, we would expect translation to be similarly inhibited. For the time being, this model awaits empirical testing and validation.

    • Cotton boll weevil, A. grandis (Coleoptera: Cur-culionidae) larvae treated with intact particles of IIV-6 or VPE under laboratory conditions suffered mortality and metamorphic arrest (2, 47). Similarly, reduced population survival has been observed in the case of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) following treatment with VPE (2). These findings prompt the question of the degree to which virus-induced apoptosis, inhibition of host protein synthesis and mortality/metamorphic arrest are interrelated; an issue that merits future study. Although it is possible that these viral entities may be used directly to control insects, identification of the active polypeptide is currently under investigation (S.L. Bilimoria, un-published data). The genes for active polypeptides may then be cloned into vectors for transformation of plants or plant colonizing microorganisms, thereby providing a novel method for controlling insect infestations. In addition to explicitly testing the apoptotic model described above, complimentary studies involving identification of the polypeptides that are primarily responsible for triggering or inhibiting apoptosis would also facilitate research into the mechanisms by which the virus subverts cellular functions for its own survival with diverse potential applications in biotechnological advances and understanding the molecular basis for viral pathogenesis in insects.

    Figure (1)  Reference (68) Relative (20)



    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint