-
The major infectious pathogen of Hand-foot and mouth disease (HFMD) [2], enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a member of the genus Enterovirus in the family Picornavirida [1]. Since it was first reported in 1969 [14], large outbreaks of HFMD have been reported worldwide [7]. Lately, increasing attention has been drawn to HFMD outbreaks as the number of infected people and the severity of cases has increased [6, 11]. Due to etiological analyses and the identification of three EV71 genotypes and more than 10 sub-genotypes [20], the study of the epidemiological characteristics of these strains on pathogenesis is of great importance. Indeed, a large outbreak of HFMD in the Anhui Province of China (Fuyang County) in March 2008 was associated with a rush for etiological studies and EV71 vaccine development [18]. However, epidemiologically, EV71 infection has been reported in Chinese population for many years [21], although different descriptions of the EV71 infectious strains in different regions have been reported in previous papers [5, 12]. Thus, there is a need to conduct a comparative biological analysis of the epidemic strains in different regions to facilitate the development of an effective EV71 vaccine. This will in turn aid investigation of the pathogenic characteristics of EV71 and their epidemiological significance, as well as provide basic data for related vaccine research. This study is based on the preliminary analysis of EV71 strains collected in different regions of China since 2006. In this research, a comparative analysis of the biological characteristics of five C4 subtypes of endemic EV71 strains from different regions of China was carried out, and the relevant data for understanding the features of EV71 endemic strains are presented. This work will provide a direct base for the ongoing research and development of an EV71 vaccine in China.
HTML
-
A routine viral isolation procedure was conducted on 44 viral samples collected by throat swab and respiratory tract blood secretions from patients from Hefei, Fuyang, Shenzhen, and Kunming. Twenty samples inoculated into Vero cells tested CPE positive (see Materials and Methods). After the neutralization test with anti-EV71 serum (anti-BrCr strain), 16 samples were positively identified as EV71. Five EV71 strains from different regions were then selected for further study (Table 1).
Table 1. Basic information of five EV71 strains
-
A preliminary study on the proliferation of the five isolated strains in Vero cells suggested that each could grow well in this milieu. In the process of cell passage for 5 generations, an increasing tendency in replicating efficiency was observed (Fig. 1A). However, there was no significant difference for the BrCr strain (which was adapted to Vero cells) while passaging over five generations (Fig. 1A). For the 5 test strains, the infectious titers of the fifth generation proliferated in Vero cells were all higher than 106 CCID 50 /mL. The proliferation dynamic curve of Vero cell passage on the fifth generation further indicated that when the five strains were inoculated into cells with a concentration of 0.05-0.1 MOI, their proliferation values peaked during the first 54-60 hours. The highest proliferation value (up to 106.8 CCID 50 /mL) was found with the FY23 strain from Fuyang; the lowest (up to 106.25 CCID50/mL) was the H44 strain from Hefei. Subsequently, titers of all strains showed a slight decrease. However, the positive control genotype A BrCr strain showed a higher proliferation titer (Fig. 1B).
-
To further understand the biological characteristics of EV71 strains from different regions, we conducted a plaque morphology analysis of all viral harvests proliferated on the fifth generation of Vero cells. The results suggested that the basic plaque formation of these isolates was similar to that of the genotype A BrCr strain. All were 2-4 mm in diameter with irregular shapes (Fig. 2).
-
Based on the basic biological characteristics of the different isolates, a gene sequence analysis of viral structural protein VP1 was done for each of the strains. VP1 cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR, and the results indicated that certain differences in the VP1 coding region exist among these five strains (Fig. 3A). However, these polymorphisms do not cause amino acids changes. The VP1 sequences of FY23 and FY22 strains were submitted to the GenBank database and were given accession No.EU812515 and No.EU913466 respectively, and the VP1 sequences of K9, S1 and H44 strains have not been submitted. A subsequent comparative analysis of the VP1 gene among the five strains and other annotated strains suggested that our isolates belong to subtype C4, a cluster with small genetic distance (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3. Analysis of genetic features of the five isolated strains. A: Comparative analysis of the sequences of the VP1 gene among the five strains, only show the different bases based on the sequence of FY23. B: The genetic distance of the VP1 gene among the five strains and other annotated strains.
-
An effective animal model of EV71 infectious pathology was not provided in previous studies [3], but the biological characteristics of EV71 suggested that neonatal mice may be suited for such a purpose [19]. Therefore, a pathological test was performed by injecting the isolated viruses into the brains of neonatal mice. The FY-23, FY-22, and S1 strains caused hind limb paralysis and eventual death in two-to three-day-old neonatal mice. However, no similar phenomenon happened with the H44 and K9 strains (Fig. 4), and there were no deaths in the control group (data was not shown). These results suggested that the five isolated EV71 strains have no significant differences in their biological characteristics, but they are genetically different and thus lead to variable nervous system lesions in neonatal mice. The pathogenic ability of FY-22, FY-23, and S1 strains would decline by serial passage on KMB-17 cells, but not on Vero cells.
-
The various strains of genotype C isolated from different regions (as mentioned above) displayed similarities and differences in their biological and genetic characteristics. To determine their antigenicity, a test was designed using anti-A genotype BrCr and anti-YF23 sera to attempt to neutralize each of the five isolated strains and the BrCr strain. The results showed that either anti-A genotype serum or anti-C genotype serum had the ability to neutralize A or C genotype viruses, but their neutralizing titers were different (Table 2).
Table 2. Cross-neutralization test of genotypes A or C anti-serum against different strains
-
Immunology analyses of the EV71 isolates were performed. Mice were subcutaneously immunized twice, and each strain showed a remarkable neutralizing antibody response on the 14th day after immunization (Fig. 5). Among them, the neutralizing antibody titers induced by the FY-22 and YF-23 strains were the highest, up to 1:2500; the titers induced by the S1 strain were lower but still over 1:1 000. However, the H44, K9, and BrCr strains were similar, only inducing titers of 1:128 to 1:256. This indicated that the immunogenicity and ability to induce neutralizing antibodies differs among the isolates.