HTML
-
The characteristics of the pregnant women in this study are summarized in Table 1. Each HIV+ mother on HAART was either given a combination of combivir + nevirapine (lamovidine + zidovudine + nevirapine) or a combination of truvada + efavirenz (emtricitabine + tenofovir + efavirenz). All HIV+ pregnant women went through vaginal delivery as the PMTCT protocol allowed but for three that had caesarean delivery. None of the pregnant women involved in the study smoked or used illegal substances. Pregnant women with other infections (diabetes, pre-eclampsia and high blood pressure) beside HIV infection were not included in the study as these factors might cause adverse pregnancy outcome. All the pregnant women in this study were given anti-malaria drug as a routine preventive therapy because malaria parasite is endemic in Nigeria. Regarding parity, more child-deaths were recorded among the HIV+ pregnant mothers. There was a low turn-out of pregnant women during 1st trimester and a high turnout at 3rd trimester in both control and HIV+ mothers. Most pregnant mothers attended antenatal during the last 3 months prior to their delivery. This was mainly due to a lack of finance, illiteracy and ignorance on the necessity of early antennal care. On the duration of HIV infection, it was observed that the HIV+ pregnant mothers had been infected for a period of 1–16 years but they enrolled for HAART within a period of 1–8 years, suggesting a delay in the enrolment of HIV infected mothers with a HAART facility (PMTCT Clinic). Reasons for this delay ranged from unwillingness to let anyone know about their status, shame and stigmatization inherent in African society, illiteracy to poverty (Table 1).
Characteristics HIV negative mothers (n = 72) HIV positive mothers (n = 122) T1 (n = 12) T2 (n = 35) T3 (n = 25) T1 (n = 16) T2 (n = 52) T3 (n = 54) Age at delivery (years) 27.5 (23–42) 29 (19–36) 29 (21–42) 27.5 (24–34) 32 (22–38) 30 (23–38) Duration of infection – – – 3 (1–6) 3 (1–16) 3 (1–10) Duration of HAART treatment (years) – – – 3 (1–6) 3 (1–7) 2 (1–8) Months of gestational 3 (2–3) 5 (4–6) 8 (6–9) 3 (1–3) 5 (4–6) 8 (7–9) Parity (alive–dead) 17 31-1 30-1 20-2 75-5 52-6 Blood pressure (mean, mm/Hg) 109/66 107/69 103/63 103/80 107/73 111/72 BMI index (kg/m2) 27.3 27.6 28.7 28.3 27.2 33.9 HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; BMI, body mass index; T, trimester; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy. Table 1. Characteristics of the pregnant mothers (median and range).
-
All the exposed infants whose mothers were HIV+ HAART treated underwent vaginal delivery but for three whose mothers went through caesarean delivery. Exposed infants were breastfed while receiving nevirapine syrup (1 mL for infant < 2.5 kg, 1.5 mL for infant > 2.5 kg) daily from 0 to 6 weeks and septrin syrup from 7th week until weaned. Detection of viral antigen using PCR was done on the exposed babies. A follow-up on the outcome of the DNA-PCR testing showed that after one year, all the exposed infants whose mothers adhered to HAART procedure tested negative to HIV and are termed seroreverters. None of the exposed children born to HIV+ HAART treated mothers was vertically infected with HIV-1 and HIV-2.
-
Cytokine secretions in the HIV+ HAART treated and control pregnant women after T and B lymphocyte stimulation irrespective of trimester categorization are shown in Table 2. The B and T cells of the PBMC from both HIV+ pregnant mothers and the control group were stimulated with mitogens (Con A, PW and PHA) to assess the cytokine secretion ability (immune strength) of their B and T lymphocytes. The estimation of secreted cytokines (IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10) were performed using customized Milliplex MAP Kit for human cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel. The cytokine quantification was done using ELISA. Results in Table 2 show that IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 levels were significantly lower in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women when compared with the HIV- pregnant women. Low IL-4 and IL-10 secretions seen in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women might be attributed to HIV infection.
HIV uninfected control (n = 72) HIV infected HAART treated (n = 122) P value Control vs treated IL-2 Con 3.5 (0–13, 822) 0.0(0–17, 056) 0.32 PW 3.3 (0–1718) 0.0(0–9060) 0.28 PHA 0.2 (0–5064) 0.0(0–105.5) 0.58 TNF-α Con 257.4 (11–5707) 33.6(0–13, 895) 0.11 PW 169.8 (5.9–13, 633) 59.6(2.3–17, 097) 0.30 PHA 149.6(5.8–24, 325) 131.1(0–12, 933) 0.54 IFN-γ Con 21.0(0–4009) 1.1(0–14, 636) 0.04* PW 26.7(15, 985) 5.3(0–17, 673) 0.01* PHA 10.4(0–17, 673) 3.7(0–8586) 0.01* IL-4 Con 3.7(0–18, 379) 0.0(0–11, 070) 0.03* PW 0.0(0–18, 379) 0.0(0–16, 213) 0.24 PHA 0.0(0–16, 213) 0.0(0–16, 213) 0.37 IL-10 Con 14.4(0–19, 577) 0.0(0–12, 960) 0.002* PW 12.8(0–19, 577) 0.0(0–8486) 0.001* PHA 8.2(0–13, 945) 2.0(0–1208) 0.02* IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interon gamma; TNF-α, tissue necrosis factor alpha; Con A, concanavalin A; PW, pokeweed; PHA, phytohymaglutinin A; vs, versus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy.
*Significant value set at (P < 0.05).Table 2. Cytokine levels (in pg/mL, median and range) after stimulation with PW, Con A and PHA in the supernatant from mothers' peripheral mononuclear cell cultures.
To assess whether gestational stages affects cytokine secretion, cytokine levels of the HIV+ HAART treated and control pregnant women were categorized into 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters respectively as shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5. Results showed that in the 1st trimester, IFN-γ stimulated by pokeweed had significantly lower value (1.0 pg/mL) when compared with the control group (59.3 pg/mL). Again, IFN-γ and IL-10 stimulated by phytohemagglutinin had significantly lower values than the control group (Table 3). In the second and third trimesters, the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women showed significantly low levels of IL-10 stimulations by pokeweed compared to their healthy control group (P = 0.03, P = 0.02). However, TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-4 secretions were similar in both the HIV+ pregnant women on HAART and the control group throughout 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters respectively (Tables 3, 4, 5).
Types of stimulation Subjects IL-2 TNF-α IFN-γ IL-4 IL-10 Con A stimulation Pregnant women on HAART (n = 122) 0.0(0–0.55) 18.5 (4–6619) 0.2 (0–4.7) 0.0(0–0) 0.0 (0–0) Control (n = 72) 2.4(0–60.9) 108.7(11–2035) 21.1(0–2920) 4.2(0–10, 756) 86.3(1–17, 840) P value 0.09 0.28 0.11 – – PW stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 0.0(0–282) 39.8 (2–17, 097) 1.0 (0–422) 0.0(0–737) 0.0 (0–0) Control 3.7(0–616) 155.6(6–3203) 59.3(3–10, 150) 0.0(0–742) 72.1(0–1445) P value 0.15 0.59 0.01* 0.33 – PHA stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 0.0(0–15.8) 867.7(0–10, 842) 0.0 (0–162) 0.0(0–0) 0.0 (0–1.9) Control 0.0(0–13.4) 906.3(8.4–4225) 499.4(4–6017) 0.0(0–9876) 33.7(0–13, 945) P value 0.83 0.79 0.03* – 0.04* IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interon gamma; TNF-α, tissue necrosis factor alpha; Con A, concanavalin A; PW, pokeweed; PHA, phytohymaglutinin A; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
*Significant value set at (P < 0.05).Table 3. Cytokine levels (in pg/mL, median and range) after stimulation with PW, Con A and PHA in the supernatant from mothers' peripheral mononuclear cell cultures at 1st trimester.
Types of stimulation Subjects IL-2 TNF-α IFN-γ IL-4 IL-10 Con A stimulation Pregnant women on HAART (n = 122) 0.9(0–17, 056) 58.2 (0–13, 895) 7.3(0–5270) 0.0(0–6502) 1.1(0–12, 960) Control (n = 72) 4.6(0–13, 822) 250.5(17–2219) 30.0(0–4009) 1.4(0–18, 379) 19.7(0–19, 577) P value 0.93 0.14 0.31 0.23 0.32 PW stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 3.1(0–9060) 104.6(3–11, 331) 5.5(0–17, 673) 0.0(0–4190) 0.5(0–8067) Control 1.1(0–85.4) 103.5(7–13, 633) 70.6(0–15, 985) 2.5(0–18, 379) 32.5(0–3690) P value 0.81 0.57 0.19 0.45 0.03* PHA stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 0.0(0–105.5) 203.3(4–12, 933) 3.8(0–8408) 0.3(0–97) 2.5(0–937) Control 0.9(0–34.8) 203.4(6–6475) 6.8(0–17, 673) 0.0(0–16, 213) 3.7(0–581) P value 0.75 0.79 0.32 0.72 0.45 IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interon gamma; TNF-α, tissue necrosis factor alpha; Con A, concanavalin A; PW, pokeweed; PHA, phytohymaglutinin A; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
*Significant value set at (P < 0.05).Table 4. Cytokine levels (in pg/mL, median and range) after stimulation with PW, Con A and PHA in the supernatant from mothers' peripheral mononuclear cell cultures at 2nd trimester.
Types of stimulation Subjects IL-2 TNF-α IFN-γ IL-4 IL-10 Con A stimulation Pregnant women on HAART (n = 122) 0.5(0–8740) 33.6(0–13, 495) 3.7(0–4636) 0.3(0–11, 070) 0.0 (0–4794) Control (n = 72) 3.8(0–315) 386.0 (14.7–5707) 22.6(0–2141) 5.3(0–13, 000) 6.6 (0–6352) P value 0.64 0.68 0.28 0.39 0.11 PW stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 0.0(0–8438) 38.6(9.1–2965) 20.9(0–17, 673) 0.0(0–16, 213) 1.1 (0–8486) Control 3.5(0–1718) 202.2 (5.8–2088) 26.6(2.7–7806) 1.9(0–413) 10.4(0–19, 577) P value 0.42 0.95 0.60 0.57 0.02* PHA stimulation Pregnant women on HAART 2.4(0–57.1) 18.7(0–1995) 3.6(0–8586) 0.0(0–16, 213) 2.9 (0–1208) Control 5.7(0–5064) 40.5(5.8–24, 325) 6.9(0–14, 243) 2.7(0–11, 785) 24.2(0–376) P value 0.10 0.43 0.59 0.44 0.27 IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interon gamma; TNF-α, tissue necrosis factor alpha; Con A, concanavalin A; PW, pokeweed; PHA, phytohymaglutinin A; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
*Significant value set at (P < 0.05).Table 5. Cytokine levels (in pg/mL, median and range) after stimulation with PW, Con A and PHA in the supernatant from mothers' peripheral mononuclear cell cultures at 3rd trimester.
Table 6 compares cytokine secretions in HIV+ pregnant women on HAART as the pregnancy progresses through 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters respectively. This intra comparison was intended to reveal the pattern of cytokine secretion within the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women as gestational age progresses to term. Results showed a significantly (P = 0.02; P = 0.03) lower secretions of TNF-α by phytohemagglutinin at the 2nd and 3rd trimesters compared to the 1st trimester (Table 6). The persistently low IL-10 secretion seen throughout 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester in Tables 3, 4 and 5 could be attributed to HIV infection. Low IL-10 secretion is the body's immune strategy to allow the clearance of the virus. Decrease in TNF-α secretion as pregnancy progressed to term could be attributed to the regulatory function of HAART in preventing excessive inflammation (Table 6).
Trimester IL-2 TNF-α IFN-γ IL-4 IL-10 Concanavalin A stimulation 1st 0.0(0–0.55) 18.5(4–6619) 0.2(0–4.7) 0.0(0–0) 0.0(0–0) 2nd 0.9(0–17, 056) 58.2(0–13, 895) 7.3(0–5270) 0.0(0–6502) 1.1(0–12, 960) 3rd 0.5(0–8740) 33.6(0–13, 495) 3.7(0–4636) 0.3(0–11, 070) 0.0(0–47, 944) P value 1st vs 2nd 0.13 0.49 0.11 – – 1st vs 3rd 0.16 0.62 0.36 – – 2nd vs 3rd 0.54 0.76 0.75 0.52 0.58 Pokeweed stimulation 1st 0.0(0–282) 39.8(2–17, 097) 1.0(0–422) 0.0(0–737) 0.0(0–0) 2nd 3.1(0–9060) 104.6 (3–11, 331) 5.5(0–17, 673) 0.0(0–4190) 0.5(0–8067) 3rd 0.0(0–8438) 38.6(9.1–2965) 20.9(0–17, 673) 0.0(0–16, 213) 1.1(0–8486) P value 1st vs 2nd 0.13 0.71 0.25 0.23 – 1st vs 3rd 0.32 0.92 0.07 0.27 – 2nd vs 3rd 0.77 0.98 0.68 0.98 0.85 Phytohemagglutinin stimulation 1st 0.0(0–15.8) 867.7 (0–10, 842) 0.0(0–162) 0.0(0–0) 0.0(0–1.9) 2nd 0.0(0–105.5) 203.3 (4–12, 933) 3.8(0–8408) 0.3(0–97) 2.5(0–937) 3rd 2.4(0–57.1) 18.7(0–1995) 3.6(0–8586) 0.0(0–16, 213) 2.9(0–1208) P value 1st vs 2nd 0.78 0.42 0.27 – 0.12 1st vs 3rd 0.59 0.02* 0.11 – 0.16 2nd vs 3rd 0.65 0.03* 0.66 0.96 0.98 IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interon gamma; TNF-α, tissue necrosis factor alpha; Con A, concanavalin A; PW, pokeweed; PHA, phytohymaglutinin A; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; vs, versus; 1st, 2nd, 3rd, trimesters.
*Significant value set at (P < 0.05).Table 6. Cytokine levels (in pg/mL, median and range) after stimulation with PW, Con A and PHA in the supernatant from mothers' peripheral mononuclear cell cultures at 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester.
-
To assess the B cell compartment as part of the immune response in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women and their healthy controls, plasma IgA, IgG and IgM were measured.
Pooled plasma IgA (mg/dL) level in the HIV+ HARRT treated and HIV- pregnant mothers showed no significant (P > 0.05) difference (Fig. 1A). Non significance in plasma IgA level suggests non-existence of mucosal infection among the HIV+ HAART treated mothers.
Figure 1. Pooled total plasma IgA, IgM and IgG. A Plasma IgA (mg/dL) level in the HIV infected HARRT treated and the control pregnant mothers showed non-significant ((P > 0.05) difference. B Data indicated significantly lower (P < 0.0001) total plasma IgM level in the HIV infected HAART treated pregnant mothers compared to the control group. C Total plasma IgG level in the HIV infected HARRT treated pregnant mothers was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher compared to their control group.
Pooled data indicated significantly lower (P < 0.05) total plasma IgM level in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant mothers compared to the HIV- control group (Fig. 1B). Low level of total plasma IgM suggests HIV infection going into chronic stage and at such IgM declines as soon as IgG rises to combat the infection.
Pooled total plasma IgG level in the HIV+ HARRT treated pregnant mothers was significantly (P < 0.001) higher compared to their control group (Fig. 1C). The high IgG level seen in the HIV+ pregnant mothers is suggestive of chronic HIV infection and secondary infection.
Plasma total IgA (mg/dL) level in the HIV+ HAART treated and HIV uninfected control at 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester showed no significant difference (Fig. 2A, (P > 0.05).
Figure 2. Total plasma IgA, IgM and IgG at 1st, 2nd and 3rd Trimester. A There was non-significant—ns (P > 0.05) difference in plasma IgA through 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters in the HIV+ HAART treated and control subjects. B Plasma IgM in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women and control subjects showed non-significant (ns) difference ((P > 0.05) throughout 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester. C Plasma IgG levels at 1st and 3rd trimesters in the HIV infected HAART treated pregnant women were significantly higher (P = 0.0005; P < 0.0001) than that in the control group.
Total plasma IgM (mg/dL) levels in the HIV+ HAART treated and the HIV- pregnant women at 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester gestations also showed no significant difference (Fig. 2B, (P > 0.05).
Data showed that plasma IgG levels at the 1st and 3rd trimesters in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women were significantly higher (P = 0.0005; P < 0.0001) than that in the control group (Fig. 2C). Intra comparison within the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women and the HIVcontrol pregnant women to evaluate the pattern of changes in IgG production as pregnancy progressed to term also showed that plasma IgG was significantly higher (P < 0.001) at 1st and 3rd trimesters compared to 2nd trimester in the HIV+ HAART treated mothers; and significantly lower (P < 0.05) at 3rd trimester compared to 1st trimester in the HIV- pregnant women (Fig. 2C). In summary, plasma total IgG was found to be significantly lower during second trimester in the HIV+ HAART treated pregnant women and significantly lower during 3rd trimester in the control pregnant women; this is suggestive of intraplacental transfer of IgG from mother to fetus.