-
Dear Editor,
In this study, a total of 409 symptomatic tobacco leaf samples were collected from 12 provinces in China during 2010 and 2011. As shown in Figure 1, those provinces are Anhui, Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hunan, Liaoning, Shandong, Shaanxi, and Yunnan. TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY are those four plant viruses that are considered the most serious causative agents of diseases in tobacco plants in China (Dai et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2015). In China, these tobacco viruses have been found in 16 provinces, including the Yunnan, Hunan, Henan, Fujian, Shaanxi, Shandong, and Liaoning provinces (Chen et al., 1997). These viruses have very high mutation rates during replication because their RNA polymerases lack the proofreading ability. Consequently, these viruses exist as numerous strains and replicate as complex and dynamic mutant clusters (Elena et al., 2005). Therefore, understanding the distribution, genetic diversity, and evolutionary relationships of these viruses is a fundamentally important step in controlling these viruses.
In this study, a total of 409 symptomatic tobacco leaf samples were collected from 12 provinces in China during 2010 and 2011. As shown in Figure 1, those provinces are Anhui, Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hunan, Liaoning, Shandong, Shaanxi, and Yunnan. Those symptoms were classified into four types: mosaic, leaf malformation, necrotic-spots, and dwarf plant. The mosaic symptom was the most common in the fields. Seventy samples collected in 2010 and 121 collected in 2011 were classified as having the mosaic symptom. Leaf malformation symptoms were found in 134 of 409 samples. Necrotic symptoms were found in 63 samples, and 21 dwarf plant samples were identified (Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 1. (A) A total of 409 symptomatic tobacco leafs were collected from 12 provinces (grey-colored). (B–E) The average detection rates of TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY in each province. 409 samples (154 in 2010 and 255 in 2011) were examined using RT-PCR, The average detection rate of TMV is shown in (B), CMV in (C), TEV in (D), and PVY in (E). The average detection rate is calculated with the following formula: the incidence (%) = (the number of samples infected by the virus / the number of all the collected samples) × 100.
To identify the viruses, all samples were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). the complete sequence of the coat protein (CP) genes of TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY were sequenced, analyzed, and compared with other complete or partially complete CP sequences available in public sequence databases (Liu et al., 2014). Genbank numbers of all complete sequences were listed in Supplementary Table S2.
A total of 118 out of 154 samples collected in 2010, and 153 out of 255 collected in 2011 were infected by at least one of the four plant viruses studied. Among the 255 samples collected in 2011, we detected TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY in 123, 72, 40, and 46 samples, respectively. These viruses were distributed widely over the 12 provinces (Figure 1A). For the Shaanxi, Yunnan, Anhui, Guizhou, Hunan, and Henan provinces, the average detection rate for TMV was more than 55% (Figure 1B). The CMV-detection rate ranged from 20% to 42% for the 12 provinces (Figure 1C). The average detection rate of TEV ranged from 0% in the Anhui province to 35% in the Shandong province (Figure 1D). The average detection rate of PVY ranged from 8% in the Shandong province to 31% in the Heilongjiang province (Figure 1E).
Although disease symptoms were evident in all samples collected, 36 samples in 2010 and 102 samples in 2011 were negative for all four tobacco viruses. Other viruses such as TVBMV and Tobacco necrosis virus (TNV), which are known to infect tobacco plants or other unknown pathogens, could have caused the observed symptoms.
Samples with mixed infections with more than one virus were very common. Eighty-four of the 118 positive samples tested positive for more than one virus in 2010. Similarly, 112 of 153 positive samples tested positive for more than one virus in 2011. Among the superinfected samples, mixed infection with TMV and CMV was the most common, while that with TEV and PVY was the least common. This may be related with the average detection rate of the virus in the field, since TMV was the most common virus in the field, with the average detection rate of 54.89%, followed by CMV (33.44%), PVY (20.91%), and TEV was the least with the average detection rate of 14.07%. In the field, the most severe mosaic symptoms on leaves were observed in samples with mixed TMV and CMV infection. The most severe necrotic symptoms were generally associated with mixed CMV and PVY infection.
Cumulatively, 18 TMV, 21 CMV, 15 TEV, and 21 PVY isolates were obtained and compared with available online CP gene sequences (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The genomic sequence and deduced amino acid sequence identities of the CP genes of TMV isolates were 97%-100% and 97%-100%, respectively; for CMV, the respective identities were 78%-100% and 81%-100%; for TEV, the isolates shared 96%-100% and 97%-100% identities; and for PVY the identities were 96%-100% and 97%-100%, respectively.
These four viruses were present as genetically distinct variants in the field. Genetic variations have been reported in many plant viruses (Moury et al., 2002). In this study, 39 TMV isolates were divided into two evolutionarily divergent groups, Group Ⅰ marked by green and Group Ⅱ marked by red, without correlation with geographical origins (Supplementary Figure S1A). CMV isolates in subgroup Ⅰ marked by green were distributed widely across 12 provinces in China, while the subgroup Ⅱ isolates marked by red were found only in some southern provinces (Fujian, Hubei, Guangxi, and Guizhou) (Supplementary Figure S1B). These results showed that the subgroups of CMV are not evenly distributed in tobacco-growing regions in China and that the distribution of CMV subgroup Ⅱ may be correlated with geographical origins. Twenty-nine TEV isolates (15 in this study and 14 from GenBank) were divided into five evolutionary divergent groups marked respectively by green, red, blue and light green without obvious correlations with geographical origins (Sup plementary Figure S1C). PVY isolates were classified into three main subgroups based on their biological properties and serological characteristics. However, not much information on PVY strains in tobacco is available. In this study, 54 PVY isolates were divided into two phylogenetic groups based on their CP gene sequences marked respectively by green and red (Supplementary Figure S1D). For further study, the mismatch distributions were evaluated to understand the population states of TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY. Since the shapes of the mismatch distributions were multimodal and ragged, TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY plausibly existed as molecularly variable populations or stable sub-populations in the field.
In order to explore the reasons for molecular variable of these four viruses, the recombination was detected among these isolates. For CMV, TEV, and PVY, the phylogenetic network analysis performed using the Neighbor-Net method implemented in the SplitsTree4 software resulted in non-tree-like phylogenetic networks. This suggests that recombination events may be contributing to the evolution of CMV, TEV, and PVY. Based on the recombination detection methods, three putative recombination events were identified. For CMV, one isolate (Guihzou_1) had Fujian_1 as its major parent and Shanxi_1 as its minor parent (Supplementary Table S3). The TEV isolate DQ871331.1 had Hubei_2 as its major parent, and Shanxi_1 as its minor parent (Supplementary Table S3). PVY isolate Anhui_2 had Guizhou_1 as its major parent, and Guizhou_2 as its minor parent (Supplementary Table S3). Since multiple independent clones from a specific RT-PCR product were analyzed, these recombination events were not due to sequencing errors. Recombination naturally existed in the CMV, TEV and PVY populations, which wasan important evolutionary factor. Compared with CMV, TEV and PVY, no recombination was identified in the genetic diversity of the TMV CP gene. Further studies on whole genomes will be required to identify recombination incidents to comprehend the role of recombination in the genetic diversity and evolution of TMV.
In conclusion, this study indicated that TMV, CMV, TEV and PVY are distributed widely and present as genetically distinct variants in 12 provinces of China. The TMV, CMV, TEV and PVY populations were in a stable condition in this study. Recombination was one of important evolutionary factors shaping the genetic structures of CMV, TEV and PVY populations. The information from this study was useful in understanding the epidemiology of TMV, CMV, TEV, and PVY, and this information should be useful in the design of long-term, sustainable control strategies for these viral diseases.
HTML
-
Province Total Mosaic Leaf Malformation Necrotic Dwarf Plant 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 Anhui 11 15 4 7 4 4 2 3 1 1 Fujian 12 15 5 8 4 4 3 3 0 0 Guangxi 14 13 7 8 5 3 2 1 0 1 Guizhou 17 21 7 13 7 5 3 2 0 1 Henan 11 31 5 15 3 10 2 4 1 2 Heilongjiang 11 12 6 4 4 5 1 2 0 1 Hubei 13 27 6 13 4 8 2 4 1 2 Hunan 15 22 7 11 5 7 2 3 1 1 Liaoning 10 15 5 5 2 6 3 4 0 0 Shandong 12 16 6 8 4 6 2 2 0 0 Shaanxi 16 33 7 14 6 12 2 4 1 3 Yunnan 12 35 5 15 4 12 2 5 1 3 Total 154 255 70 121 52 82 26 37 6 15 Table S1. Disease symptoms of 409 tobacco leaf samples from 12 provinces in China
TMV Anhui_1 2010 Anhui KJ508018 Fujian_1 2010 Fujian KJ508019 Guangxi_1 2010 Guangxi KJ508020 Guangxi_2 2011 Guangxi KJ508021 Guizhou_1 2010 Guizhou KJ508022 Guizhou_2 2011 Guizhou KJ508023 Heilongjiang_1 2010 Heilongjiang KJ508024 Henan_1 2010 Henan KJ508025 Henan_2 2011 Henan KJ508026 Hubei_1 2010 Hubei KJ508027 Hubei_2 2011 Hubei KJ508028 Hunan_1 2010 Hunan KJ508029 Hunan_2 2011 Hunan KJ508030 Liaoning_1 2010 Liaoning KJ508031 Shaanxi_1 2010 Shaanxi KJ508032 Shaanxi_2 2010 Shaanxi KJ508033 Shandong_1 2010 Shandong KJ508034 Shandong_2 2011 Shandong KJ508035 Yunnan_1 2010 Yunnan KJ508018 Yunnan_2 2011 Yunnan KJ508019 CMV Anhui_1 2010 Anhui KJ513380 Fujian_1 2010 Fujian KJ513381 Fujian_2 2010 Fujian KJ513382 Guangxi_1 2010 Guangxi KJ513383 Guizhou_1 2010 Guizhou KJ513384 Guizhou_2 2010 Guizhou KJ513385 Heilongjiang_1 2010 Heilongjiang KJ513386 Henan_1 2010 Henan KJ513387 Henan_2 2010 Henan KJ513388 Hubei_1 2010 Hubei KJ513389 Hubei_2 2011 Hubei KJ513390 Hunan_1 2010 Hunan KJ513391 Hunan_2 2011 Hunan KJ513392 Liaoning_1 2010 Liaoning KJ513393 Liaoning_1 2010 Liaoning KJ513397 Shaanxi_1 2010 Shaanxi KJ513400 Shaanxi_2 2011 Shaanxi KJ513403 Shandong_1 2010 Shandong KJ513405 Shandong_2 2011 Shandong KJ513406 Yunnan_1 2010 Yunnan KJ513409 Yunnan_2 2011 Yunnan KJ513410 TEV Fujian_1 2010 Fujian KJ513394 Fujian_2 2010 Fujian KJ513395 Heilongjiang_1 2010 Heilongjiang KJ513396 Henan_1 2010 Henan KJ513398 Henan_2 2010 Henan KJ513399 Hubei_1 2010 Hubei KJ513401 Hubei_2 2011 Hubei KJ513402 Hunan_1 2010 Hunan KJ513404 Hunan_2 2011 Hunan KJ513407 Shaanxi_1 2010 Shaanxi KJ513408 Shaanxi_2 2011 Shaanxi KJ513411 Shandong_1 2010 Shandong KJ513412 Shandong_2 2010 Shandong KJ513413 Yunnan_1 2010 Yunnan KJ513414 Yunnan_2 2010 Yunnan KJ513415 PVY Anhui_1 2010 Anhui KJ513416 Anhui_2 2010 Anhui KJ513417 Fujian_1 2010 Fujian KJ513418 Guangxi_1 2010 Guangxi KJ513419 Guangxi_2 20110 Guangxi KJ513421 Guizhou_1 2010 Guizhou KJ513422 Guizhou_2 2011 Guizhou KJ513423 Heilongjiang_1 2010 Heilongjiang KJ513425 Heilongjiang_2 2010 Heilongjiang KJ513426 Henan_1 2010 Henan KJ513427 Henan_2 2010 Henan KJ513429 Hunan_1 2010 Hunan KJ513420 Hunan_2 2010 Hunan KJ513424 Liaoning_1 2010 Liaoning KJ513428 Liaoning_2 2010 Liaoning KJ513433 Shaanxi_1 2010 Shaanxi KJ513435 Shaanxi_2 2011 Shaanxi KJ513436 Shandong_1 2010 Shandong KJ513430 Shandong_2 2011 Shandong KJ513432 Yunnan_1 2010 Yunnan KJ513434 Yunnan_2 2011 Yunnan KJ513416 Table S2. The time, geographical origin and accession number of all isolates used in this study
Virus Breakpoint Recombinanta Parentals Method (Average P value) Start End Major Minor R G B M C S 3Seq CMV 18 603 Guizhou_1 (KJ513384)b Fujian_1 (KJ51338) 97.4% Shaanxi_1 (KJ513400) 100% 9.46×10-11 1.08×10-9 - 3.98×10-03 3.75×10-03 - 7.16×10-10 TEV 261 498 DQ871331.1 (DQ871331.1) Hubei_2 (KJ51340) 99.1% JX512813.1 (JX512813.1) 99% 3.44×10-03 - - 2.03×10-07 1.00×10-07 - 1.43×10-09 PVY 322 434 Anhui_2 (KJ513417) Guizhou_1 (KJ51342) 98.8% Guangxi_1 (KJ5134T9) 99.5% 1.38×10-03 - 1.38×10-03 2.45×10-03 1.28×10-03 1.39×10-03 1.28×10-03 Note:a only events supported by at least four of the different RDP3-implemented methods. The support probability for each method is shown.b GenBank accession number. Table S3. Putative recombination events of CP gene in CMV, TEV and PVY populations
Figure S1. (A) Neighbor-joining tree of tobacco mosaic virus. (B) Neighbor-joining tree of cucumber mosaic virus. (C) Neighbor-joining tree of tobacco etch virus. (D) Neighbor-joining tree of potato virus Y. Bootstrap analysis was applied using 1, 000 replications. Only bootstrap values (%) higher than 50 are shown. For (A)-(D): Neighbor-joining tree based on the coat protein nucleotide sequences. The strains were marked by green circles were collected in this study, the rest strains were from online databases.