HTML
-
From January 2010 to December 2018, 104,874 samples with ILI were collected at Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau. The samples contained 17,973 cases (17.14%) of influenza A and 7274 cases (6.94%) of influenza B. The information of each year samples was shown in Table 1.
Year Samples Influenza (%) Influenza A (%) Influenza B (%) 2010 9368 1695 (18.09) 1203 (12.84) 492 (5.25) 2011 6997 1608 (22.98) 1489 (21.28) 119 (1.70) 2012 13,054 3674 (28.14) 2209 (16.92) 1465(11.22) 2013 6543 1178 (18.00) 1096 (16.75) 82 (1.25) 2014 8833 2504 (28.35) 2037 (23.06) 467 (5.29) 2015 11,427 2826 (24.73) 2124 (18.59) 702 (6.14) 2016 12,563 2880 (22.92) 1740 (13.85) 1140(9.07) 2017 15,828 4122 (26.04) 3693 (23.33) 429 (2.71) 2018 20,261 4760 (23.49) 2382 (11.76) 2378(11.74) Total 104,874 25,247 (24.07) 17,973 (17.14) 7274(6.94) Table 1. Annual distribution of influenza cases at Kiang Wu Hospital in Macau, 2010–2018.
The number of ILI samples were increasingly collected and the number of samples in 2018 was twice as many as in 2010 (9368 cases in 2010 and 20,261 cases in 2018). The positive rate of influenza was relatively stable in these years, ranging from 18% to 28%. The positive rate of influenza A ranged from 10% to 25% and the positive rate of influenza B ranged from 1% to 10%. In most years, the positive rate of influenza A was greater than influenza B. However, influenza B showed unique activity in 2012 and 2018. The ILI sample number and positive rate in 2012 and 2018 (11.22% in 2012 and 11.74% in 2018) were higher than that in remaining years.
The total number and the mean month positive rate of influenza A and B were showed in Fig. 1 to explore the seasonality of the influenza epidemic. The positive rates in 2012, 2017 and 2018 were different from the remaining years. Note, for convenience of description, we denote the years except these three years as the normal years. First, the positive rate of influenza A in July 2017 was higher ([ 40%) than in the normal years. In addition, the peaks of the influenza B in 2012 and 2018 appeared in January and February with the positive rate (close to 30%) was higher than that in the normal years. In the normal years, the incidence of influenza A occurred year-round and did not show seasonality (Fig. 1A). The positive rates of influenza A in January and February were slightly higher than other months (Fig. 1B). Influenza B showed seasonality with the peak appeared in spring (March to May) (Fig. 1C). The positive rates of influenza B in other months were very low (Fig. 1D).
Figure 1. Distribution of influenza A and influenza B. A Total number of influenza A per month. Positive rate of influenza A per month. B Positive rate of influenza A per month. C Total number of influenza B per month. D Positive rate of influenza B per month. The histograms represent the mean number or mean positive rate in the normal years (2010–2011 and 2013–2016). The error bars represent the standard error. The red, green and blue lines represent the trend of influenza A or influenza B in 2012, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
-
The influenza data in the normal years, including 2010–2011 and 2013–2016, were analyzed. A total of 55,731 ILI samples were included, of which 9689 (17.39%) cases were influenza A and 3002 (5.39%) cases were influenza B. The influenza data were classified by age (0–4, 5–10, 11–17, 18–39, 40–64 and > 64 years), gender (fe-male and male), area (local and tourist), and season (spring, summer, autumn and winter). Figure 2 showed the distri-bution of classified influenza data. Table 2 showed the results of univariate analysis, i.e. Chi-square test.
Figure 2. Distribution of influenza A and influenza B among different age, gender, area and season in the normal years. A The number and positive rate of influenza A and B in different age groups. B The number and positive rate of influenza A and B in different genders. C The number and positive rate of influenza A and B in different areas. D The number and positive rate of influenza A and B in different seasons.
Variable Samples Influenza A Influenza B Number (%) Chi-square Number (%) Chi-square Age 0–4 23,710 3039 (12.82) χ2 = 949.75 658(2.78) χ2 = 1110.6 5–10 7492 1288 (17.19) P < 2× 10-16 894(11.93) P < 2× 10-16 11–17 2696 660 (24.48) 236(8.75) 18–39 11,798 2824 (23.94) 741(6.28) 40–64 6036 1354 (22.43) 381(6.31) > 64 3999 524 (13.10) 92 (2.30) Gender Female 28,590 5029 (17.59) χ2 = 1.68 1559 (5.45) χ2 = 0.48 Male 27,141 4660 (17.17) P = 0.1943 1443 (5.32) P = 0.488 Area Local 52,439 8968 (17.10) χ2 = 49.35 2797 (5.33) χ2 = 4.68 Tourist 3292 721 (21.90) P < 2× 10-12 205(6.23) P = 0.0306 Season Spring 18,288 2357 (12.89) χ2 = 653.94 1901 (10.39) χ2 = 1406.5 Summer 10,468 2059 (19.67) P < 2× 10-16 341(3.26) P < 2× 10-16 Autumn 10,568 1566 (14.82) 153(1.45) Winter 16,407 3707 (22.59) 607(3.70) Table 2. Chi-square test results of influenza A and B by age, gender, area, and season in normal years.
The number of ILI samples aged 0–4 years old was the highest among all age groups, accounting for 42.5% of the total. Children were thus the most prone to ILI symptoms and were willing to go to the hospital for diagnosis and treatment. The positive rate of influenza A and influenza B in 0–4 year-old group (influenza A: 12.8%; influenza B: 2.8%) and the > 64 year-old group (influenza A: 13.2%; influenza B: 2.3%) were low compare to other age groups (Fig. 2A). The positive rate of influenza A was highest in 18–39 year-old group (23.9%), while the positive rate of influenza B was highest in 5–10 year-old group (11.5%). The results of Chi-square test proved that the difference among different age groups was significant (influenza A: P < 2× 10-16; influenza B: P < 2× 10-16).
ILI samples were classified by gender (28,590 females and 27,141 males). We calculated and compared the pos-itive rate of influenza A and influenza B in female and male. The positive rates of influenza A and B in females were slightly higher than those in males (influenza A: 17.59% for female and 17.17% for male; influenza B: 5.45% for female and 5.32% for male) (Fig. 2B). The Chi-square test indicate no significant difference between females and males (influenza A: P = 0.1943; influenza B: P = 0.488).
We divided ILI samples into local and tourists. The positive rates of influenza A and B among tourists were higher than that among locals (influenza A: 17.10% for local vs 21.90% for tourist; influenza B: 5.33% for local vs 6.23% for tourist) (Fig. 2C). The Chi-square test proved that the difference was significant between local and tourist (influenza A: P < 2× 10-12; influenza B: P = 0.0306).
The epidemic of influenza also varied season by season. ILI samples were mostly collected during spring and winter. The positive rate of influenza A was the highest in winter (22.6%) and the lowest in spring (12.9%) (Fig. 2D). But the positive rate of influenza B was the highest in spring (10.4%). The results of Chi-square test proved that the difference among different season is significant (in-fluenza A: P < 2× 10-16; influenza B: P < 2× 10-16).
Binary multivariable logistic regression was used to explore risk factors associated with influenza A and B. The variables include age, gender, area and season. The forest plot of logistic regression was showed in Fig. 3A, 3B and the detailed values of logistic regression were shown in Supplementary Table S1. First, for different age groups, the odds of influenza A and B were lower in the 0–4 year-old group and > 64 year-old group than other age group. The odds of influenza A in the 11–17 years-old group were twice as that in the 0–4 year-old group (OR = 2.21, P < 2× 10-16). The 11–17 year old group showed the highest odds of influenza A. The odds of influenza B in the 5–10 year-old group were 4 times higher than the odds in 0–4 year-old group (OR = 4.38, P < 2× 10-16). The 5–10 year-old group had the highest odds of influenza B. Secondly, consistent with the results of Chi-square test, the results of binary multivariable logistic regression showed that no significant difference in infections of influenza A and B between female and male. Thirdly, although the odds of influenza A and B in tourist was slightly higher than that in locals (influenza A: OR = 1.09, P = 0.0557; influenza B: OR = 1.15, P = 0.0771), the difference was not signif-icant. The result is not the same as the result of the Chi-square test. The reason for this phenomenon is that the covariate affects the result of multiple logistic regression (Wang et al. 2017). Area was not a risk factor for infection of influenza A and B in the normal years. Finally, the odds of influenza A were the lowest in spring, while the odds of influenza B were the highest in spring.
Figure 3. Forest plot of binary multivariable logistic regression. A Binary multivariable logistic regression of influenza A in normal years. B Binary multivariable logistic regression of influenza B in normal years. C Binary multivariable logistic regression of influenza A in July 2017. D Binary multivariable logistic regression of influenza B in January–February 2012 and January–February 2018. The asterisk represents the significance level (*** < 0.001, ** < 0.01, * < 0.05).
-
Because the epidemic of influenza A in July 2017 is dif-ferent from the normal years, we extracted influenza A data in July 2017 and compared it with the data in July of normal years. The distribution of influenza A and the comparison between 2017 and normal years were showed in Table 3. A total of 3461 ILI samples were collected in July 2017, which exceeded the total samples of the normal years (2577 samples in six years). Also, the positive rate of influenza A in July 2017 was 47.2%, which was signifi-cantly higher than that (11.6%) in July of normal years (P < 2× 10-16). The forest plot of logistic regression was showed in Fig. 3C and the detailed values of logistic regression were shown in Supplementary Table S2.
Variables Influenza A in 2017 Influenza A in normal P value Samples N (%) P value Samples N (%) Age 0–4 1335 519 (38.9) χ2 = 80.43 1109 83(7.5) < 2× 10-16 5–10 419 188 (44.9) P =7910-16 269 28(10.4) < 2× 10-16 11–17 116 68 (58.6) 116 14(12.1) 3× 10-13 18–39 789 449 (56.9) 549 99(18.0) < 2× 10-16 40–64 478 253 (52.9) 288 45(15.6) < 2× 10-16 > 64 324 157 (48.5) 246 30(12.2) < 2× 10-16 Gender Male 1679 784 (46.7) χ2 = 0.31 1289 152 (11.8) < 2× 10-16 Female 1782 850 (47.7) P = 0.5771 1288 147 (11.4) < 2× 10-16 Area Local 3042 1401 (46.1) χ2 = 13.11 2414 273 (11.3) < 2× 10-16 Tourist 419 233 (55.6) P < 0.0003 163 26(15.9) < 2× 10-16 Total 3461 1634 (47.2) 2577 299 (11.6) < 2× 10-16 Table 3. Distribution and comparison of influenza A in July 2017.
The Chi-square test and logistic regression show sig-nificant differences among different age groups. The odds of influenza A in the 11–17 year-old group (OR = 2.15, P-value = 0.0001) and 18–39 year-old group (OR = 2.04, P value = 1.29× 10-14) were twice as the odds of influ-enza A in 0–4 year-old group.
Consistent with the results in the normal years, the results of Chi-square test and logistic regression indicated there is no significant difference between male and female (P = 0.5771). However, the differences in influenza A infection between locals and tourists is significant. The odds of influenza A in tourists (OR = 1.32, P value = 0.0091) were significantly higher than local.
-
Because the epidemic of influenza B in January–February 2012 and January–February 2018 is different from the normal years, we extracted influenza B data in this period and compared it with the influenza B in January–February of normal years. The distribution of influenza B and the comparison between 2012, 2018 and normal years were showed in Table 4. A total of 11,677 ILI samples were collected in January–February 2012 and January–February 2018, which was close to the total samples of the normal years (13,206 samples in six years). Also, the positive rate of influenza B in January–February 2012 and January– February 2018 was 25.9%, which was significantly higher than that (3.9%) in January–February of normal years (P < 2× 10-16). The forest plot of logistic regression was showed in Fig. 3D and the detailed values of logistic regression were shown in Supplementary Table S2.
Variables Influenza B in 2012 and 2018 Influenza B in normal Chi-Squre Samples N (%) P value Samples N (%) Age 0–4 4369 675 (15.4) χ2 = 566.35 5338 125 (2.3) < 2× 10-16 5–10 2362 926 (39.2) P < 2× 10-16 1561 129 (8.3) < 2× 10-16 11–17 647 260 (40.2) 667 32 (4.8) < 2× 10-16 18–39 2435 714 (29.3) 3302 138 (4.2) < 2× 10-16 40–64 1275 349 (27.4) 1494 79 (5.3) < 2× 10-16 > 64 589 110 (18.7) 824 15 (1.8) < 2× 10-16 Gender Male 5498 1384 (25.2) χ2 = 3.11 6321 235 (3.7) < 2× 10-16 Female 6188 1650 (26.7) P = 0.0779 6885 283 (4.1) < 2× 10-16 Area Local 10,486 2681 (25.6) χ2 = 9.01 12,284 464 (3.8) < 2× 10-16 Tourist 1191 353 (29.6) P = 0.0027 922 54 (5.9) < 2× 10-16 Total 11,677 3034 (25.9) 13,206 518 (3.9) < 2× 10-16 Table 4. Distribution and comparison of influenza B in January–February 2012 and January–February 2018.
Among different age groups, the odds of influenza B were the highest in the 5–10 year-old group (OR = 3.51, P < 2× 10-16) and 11–17 year-old group (OR = 3.66, P < 2× 10-16), and lowest in 0–4 year-old group and > 64 year-old group (OR = 1.07, P = 0.3131).
Consistent with the results in the normal years, the Chi-square test and logistic regression result showed no sig-nificant differences in infections of influenza B between male (OR = 1.03, P value = 0.4670) and female. However, the differences in influenza B infection between locals and tourists were significant. The odds of influenza B in tourists (OR = 1.25, P value = 0.0474) were significantly higher than local.