Wei-wei Gai, Yan Zhang, Di-han Zhou, Yao-qing Chen, Jing-yi Yang and Hui-min Yan. PIKA Provides an Adjuvant Effect to Induce Strong Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV*[J]. Virologica Sinica, 2011, 26(2): 81-94. doi: 10.1007/s12250-011-3183-z
Citation: Wei-wei Gai, Yan Zhang, Di-han Zhou, Yao-qing Chen, Jing-yi Yang, Hui-min Yan. PIKA Provides an Adjuvant Effect to Induce Strong Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV* .VIROLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 26(2) : 81-94.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12250-011-3183-z

PIKA Provides an Adjuvant Effect to Induce Strong Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV*

cstr: 32224.14.s12250-011-3183-z
  • 收稿日期: 2011-01-17
    录用日期: 2011-02-18
  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) is a deadly infectious disease caused by SARS Coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Inactivated SARS-CoV has been explored as a vaccine against SARS-CoV. However, safe and potent adjuvants, especially with more efficient and economical needle-free vaccination are always needed more urgently in a pandemic. The development of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant and vaccine for prevention of emergent infectious diseases such as SARS will be an important advancement. PIKA, a stabilized derivative of Poly (I:C), was previously reported to be safe and potent as adjuvant in mouse models. In the present study, we demonstrated that the intraperitoneal and intranasal co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine together with this improved Poly (I:C) derivative induced strong anti-SARS-CoV mucosal and systemic humoral immune responses with neutralizing activity against pseudotyped virus. Although intraperitoneal immunization of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine alone could induce a certain level of neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites, co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine with PIKA as adjuvant could induce a much higher neutralizing activity. When intranasal immunization was used, PIKA was obligatorily for inducing neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites and was correlated with both mucosal IgA and mucosal IgG response. Overall, PIKA could be a good mucosal adjuvant candidate for inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine for use in possible future pandemic.

PIKA Provides an Adjuvant Effect to Induce Strong Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV*

  • Corresponding author: Hui-min Yan, hmyan@wh.iov.cn
  • Received Date: 17 January 2011
    Accepted Date: 18 February 2011

    Fund Project: National S & T Major Project on Major Infectious Diseases 2008ZX10001-010National Basic Research Program of China 2005CB522903National Natural Science Foundation of China 30670097National Key R & D Program 2007BAI28B04National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program

  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) is a deadly infectious disease caused by SARS Coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Inactivated SARS-CoV has been explored as a vaccine against SARS-CoV. However, safe and potent adjuvants, especially with more efficient and economical needle-free vaccination are always needed more urgently in a pandemic. The development of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant and vaccine for prevention of emergent infectious diseases such as SARS will be an important advancement. PIKA, a stabilized derivative of Poly (I:C), was previously reported to be safe and potent as adjuvant in mouse models. In the present study, we demonstrated that the intraperitoneal and intranasal co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine together with this improved Poly (I:C) derivative induced strong anti-SARS-CoV mucosal and systemic humoral immune responses with neutralizing activity against pseudotyped virus. Although intraperitoneal immunization of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine alone could induce a certain level of neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites, co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine with PIKA as adjuvant could induce a much higher neutralizing activity. When intranasal immunization was used, PIKA was obligatorily for inducing neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites and was correlated with both mucosal IgA and mucosal IgG response. Overall, PIKA could be a good mucosal adjuvant candidate for inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine for use in possible future pandemic.

  • 加载中
    1. Alexopoulou L, Holt A C, Medzhitov R, et al. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded rna and activation of nf-kappab by toll-like receptor 3. Nature, 413 (6857): 732-738.
        doi: 10.1038/35099560

    2. Baer G M. 1981. The effect of interferon on rabies infection of animals. Tex Rep Biol Med, 41: 526-531.

    3. Belshe R B, Mendelman P M, Treanor J, et al. 1998. The efficacy of live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenzavirus vaccine in children. N Engl J Med, 338 (20): 1405-1412.
        doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805143382002

    4. Bradney C P, Sempowski G D, Liao H X, et al. 2002. Cytokines as adjuvants for the induction of anti-human immunodeficiency virus peptide immunoglobulin g (igg) and iga antibodies in serum and mucosal secretions after nasal immunization. J Virol, 76 (2): 517-524.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.517-524.2002

    5. Burns J W, Siadat-Pajouh M, Krishnaney A A, et al. 1996. Protective effect of rotavirus vp6-specific iga monoclonal antibodies that lack neutralizing activity. Science, 272 (5258): 104-107.
        doi: 10.1126/science.272.5258.104

    6. Champney K J, Levine D P, Levy H B, et al. 1979. Modified polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid complex: Sustained interferonemia and its physiological associates in humans. Infect Immun, 25 (3): 831-837.

    7. Czerkinsky C, Anjuere F, Mcghee J R, et al. 1999. Mucosal immunity and tolerance: Relevance to vaccine development. Immunol Rev, 170: 197-222.
        doi: 10.1111/imr.1999.170.issue-1

    8. Fouchier R A, Kuiken T, Schutten M, et al. 2003. Aetiology: Koch's postulates fulfilled for sars virus. Nature, 423 (6937): 240.
        doi: 10.1038/423240a

    9. Gai W, Zou W, Lei L, et al. 2008. Effects of different immunization protocols and adjuvant on antibody responses to inactivated sars-cov vaccine. Viral Immunol, 21 (1): 27-37.
        doi: 10.1089/vim.2007.0079

    10. Herman R, Baron S. 1971. Immunologic-mediated protection of trypanosoma congolense-infected mice by polyribonucleotides. J Protozool, 18 (4): 661-666.
        doi: 10.1111/jeu.1971.18.issue-4

    11. Ichinohe T, Watanabe I, Ito S, et al. 2005. Synthetic double-stranded rna poly(i:C) combined with mucosal vaccine protects against influenza virus infection. J Virol, 79 (5): 2910-2919.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.5.2910-2919.2005

    12. Jacobs B L, Langland J O. 1996. When two strands are better than one: The mediators and modulators of the cellular responses to double-stranded rna. Virology, 219 (2): 339-349.
        doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0259

    13. Kang S M, Compans R W. 2003. Enhancement of mucosal immunization with virus-like particles of simian immunodeficiency virus. J Virol, 77 (6): 3615-3623.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3615-3623.2003

    14. Kapikian A Z, Hoshino Y, Chanock R M, et al. 1996. Efficacy of a quadrivalent rhesus rotavirus-based human rotavirus vaccine aimed at preventing severe rotavirus diarrhea in infants and young children. J Infect Dis, 174 Suppl 1: S65-72.

    15. Koutsky L A, Ault K A, Wheeler C M, et al. 2002. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med, 347 (21): 1645-1651.
        doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020586

    16. Kumar M, Carmichael G G. 1998. Antisense rna: Function and fate of duplex rna in cells of higher eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 62 (4): 1415-1434.

    17. Lamm M E. 1997. Interaction of antigens and antibodies at mucosal surfaces. Annu Rev Microbiol, 51: 311-340.
        doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.311

    18. Lau Y F, Tang L H, Ooi E E. 2009. A tlr3 ligand that exhibits potent inhibition of influenza virus replication and has strong adjuvant activity has the potential for dual applications in an influenza pandemic. Vaccine, 27 (9): 1354-1364.
        doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.048

    19. Lau Y F, Tang L H, Mccall A W, et al. An adjuvant for the induction of potent, protective humoral responses to an h5n1 influenza virus vaccine with antigen-sparing effect in mice. J Virol, 84 (17): 8639-8649.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.00596-10

    20. Lau Y L, Peiris J S. 2005. Pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Curr Opin Immunol, 17 (4): 404-410.
        doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.05.009

    21. Leung W K, To K F, Chan P K, et al. 2003. Enteric involvement of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection. Gastroenterology, 125 (4): 1011-1017.
        doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.001

    22. Levine M M. 2000. Immunization against bacterial diseases of the intestine. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 31 (4): 336-355.
        doi: 10.1097/00005176-200010000-00003

    23. Li L, Shen E-X, Huang J, et al. 2006. Pika adjuvant induces the immune responses in mouse in vitro and in vivo. Chin J Immunol, 22 (11): 983-986.

    24. Li P-P, Yang X-M, Fang Z-Z, et al. 2005. Preparation of inactivated sars vaccine. Chin J Biologicals, 18: 390-393.

    25. Lin H X, Gontier C, Saron M, et al. 1993. A new immunostimulatory complex (pickca) in experimental rabies: Antiviral and adjuvant effects. Arch Virol, 131 (3-4): 307-319.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01378634

    26. Lin M, Tseng H-K, Trejaut J-A, et al. 2003. Association of HLA class I with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. BMC Med Genet, 4: 9.

    27. Luo J, Gai W, Lei L, et al. 2006. Prokaryotic expression of the sars-cov spike protein and preliminary studies on its mucosal immune response. J Wuhan Univ (Natural Science) 52 (6): 733-738.

    28. Mazanec M B, Kaetzel C S, Lamm M E, et al. 1992. Intracellular neutralization of virus by immunoglobulin a antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89 (15): 6901-6905.
        doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6901

    29. Modlin J F. 2004. Poliomyelitis in the united states: The final chapter? JAMA, 292 (14): 1749-1751.
        doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1749

    30. Neutra M R, Kozlowski P A. 2006. Mucosal vaccines: The promise and the challenge. Nat Rev Immunol, 6 (2): 148-158.
        doi: 10.1038/nri1777

    31. Qu X X, Hao P, Song X J, et al. 2005. Identification of two critical amino acid residues of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for its variation in zoonotic tropism transition via a double substitution strategy. J Biol Chem, 280 (33): 29588-29595.
        doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500662200

    32. Sambrook J F E, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    33. Shen E, Li L, Li L, et al. 2007. Pika as an adjuvant enhances specific humoral and cellular immune responses following the vaccination of mice with hbsag plus pika. Cell Mol Immunol, 4 (2): 113-120.

    34. Sloat B R, Cui Z. 2006. Nasal immunization with anthrax protective antigen protein adjuvanted with polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid induced strong mucosal and systemic immunities. Pharm Res, 23 (6): 1217-1226.
        doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-0206-9

    35. Subbarao K, Mcauliffe J, Vogel L, et al. 2004. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J Virol, 78 (7): 3572-3577.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3572-3577.2004

    36. Takao S I, Kiyotani K, Sakaguchi T, et al. 1997. Protection of mice from respiratory sendai virus infections by recombinant vaccinia viruses. J Virol, 71 (1): 832-838.

    37. Takasuka N, Fujii H, Takahashi Y, et al. 2004. A subcutaneously injected uv-inactivated sars coronavirus vaccine elicits systemic humoral immunity in mice. Int Immunol, 16 (10): 1423-1430.
        doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh143

    38. Tang J W, To K F, Lo A W, et al. 2007. Quantitative temporal-spatial distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (sars-cov) in post-mortem tissues. J Med Virol, 79 (9): 1245-1253.
        doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9071

    39. Ter Meulen J, Bakker A B, Van Den Brink E N, et al. 2004. Human monoclonal antibody as prophylaxis for sars coronavirus infection in ferrets. Lancet, 363 (9427): 2139-2141.
        doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16506-9

    40. To K F, Lo A W. 2004. Exploring the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (sars): The tissue distribution of the coronavirus (sars-cov) and its putative receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ace2). J Pathol, 203 (3): 740-743.
        doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9896

    41. Underdown B J. 2005. Parenteral immunization induces mucosal protection: A challenge to the mucosal immunity paradigm, In: Mucosal immunology (Mestecky J, Bienenstock J, Lamm M E, et al. ed. ), 3rd edition. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press. Vol 1, p831-840.

    42. Verdijk R M, Mutis T, Esendam B, et al. 1999. Polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid (poly(i:C)) induces stable maturation of functionally active human dendritic cells. J Immunol, 163 (1): 57-61.

    43. Xiao B G, Link H. 1997. Mucosal tolerance: A two-edged sword to prevent and treat autoimmune diseases. Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 85 (2): 119-128.
        doi: 10.1006/clin.1997.4432

    44. Yan H, Lamm M E, Bjorling E, et al. 2002. Multiple functions of immunoglobulin a in mucosal defense against viruses: An in vitro measles virus model. J Virol, 76 (21): 10972-10979.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.21.10972-10979.2002

    45. Yang Y L, Reis L F, Pavlovic J, et al. 1995. Deficient signaling in mice devoid of double-stranded rna-dependent protein kinase. Embo J, 14 (24): 6095-6106.

  • 加载中

Figures(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(5026) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(0)

Related
Proportional views
    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    PIKA Provides an Adjuvant Effect to Induce Strong Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Against SARS-CoV*

      Corresponding author: Hui-min Yan, hmyan@wh.iov.cn
    • 1. Mucosal Immunity Research Group, The State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
    • 2. The State Key Laboratory of Virology and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Fund Project:  National S & T Major Project on Major Infectious Diseases 2008ZX10001-010National Basic Research Program of China 2005CB522903National Natural Science Foundation of China 30670097National Key R & D Program 2007BAI28B04National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program

    Abstract: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) is a deadly infectious disease caused by SARS Coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Inactivated SARS-CoV has been explored as a vaccine against SARS-CoV. However, safe and potent adjuvants, especially with more efficient and economical needle-free vaccination are always needed more urgently in a pandemic. The development of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant and vaccine for prevention of emergent infectious diseases such as SARS will be an important advancement. PIKA, a stabilized derivative of Poly (I:C), was previously reported to be safe and potent as adjuvant in mouse models. In the present study, we demonstrated that the intraperitoneal and intranasal co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine together with this improved Poly (I:C) derivative induced strong anti-SARS-CoV mucosal and systemic humoral immune responses with neutralizing activity against pseudotyped virus. Although intraperitoneal immunization of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine alone could induce a certain level of neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites, co-administration of inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine with PIKA as adjuvant could induce a much higher neutralizing activity. When intranasal immunization was used, PIKA was obligatorily for inducing neutralizing activity in serum as well as in mucosal sites and was correlated with both mucosal IgA and mucosal IgG response. Overall, PIKA could be a good mucosal adjuvant candidate for inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine for use in possible future pandemic.